User talk:Regua

Deleted content
Alright.. I have put the content (as of your last edit) at User:Regua/Gamer. Friday (talk) 19:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Here is the text you asked for Sarcastic Gamer  Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere!  (Whisper...) 16:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sarcastic Gamer
Sarcastic Gamer, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sarcastic Gamer satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sarcastic Gamer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Sarcastic Gamer during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Tone
You were asking about what was wrong about the tone of the article on the AfD page. I prefer to answer it here, as it is not directly related to the deletion debate. Parts where I believe the tone is not fully encyclopedic, is for example the long list of names of contributers with their nicknames, and the history of the creation reads a little like 'Adam's epic quest creating his awesome blog'. Hoever, I don't think it's a very major concern. I believe the article is fairly well written, and notable enough for inclusion. It may have some verifiability issues here and there. (for example, the statement "As the site is non-commercial, rarely does the staff take part in gaming events and gatherings." is very hard to source). Regarding the AfD, it could go either way. I'm pretty much neutral on it, I just believe that the article could not be speedily deleted, so I set it up. I hope you stick around, and keep helping ith the encyclopedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi i noticed you were seeking adoption, i will gladly try to help you become an experienced wikipedian AF'US'CO 22:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there! Thanks for your offer. I'd be glad if you could help me on my way to becoming an Wikipedia administrator ;) You can start with explaining me, why exactly my first article (Sarcastic Gamer) is so hated by some of the admins; linking to the "notability" pages isn't enough, I still can't get it. I did my best for the article to be as unbiased and honest as possible. Thank you once again! Regua (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Delta-v
I just split this off from the Delta-v page because it didn't go with the astrodynamic usage and the Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

You claim that Delta-v (physics) is on the Velocity page. Really? Where?WolfKeeper (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be there, but it isn't; that being the case I dispute the deletion.WolfKeeper (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, the Velocity articles gives the same definitions as you do, just without the formulas. Couldn't you edit the Velocity page and put all the delta-v related things in there?  Regua (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NYU Shanghai Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NYU Shanghai Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)