User talk:Rehanyarkhan

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Job E  6   23:57, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Aryan invasion theory
Hello - did you email me? If so, I didn't remove your text from that article; the only change I've ever made to that article is this - removing something having nothing to do with the Ramayana - and I don't think that's what you're talking about. Check the history of the article. CDC  (talk)  21:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Flower Advertising
Hello, would you please desist from advertising non-notable and non-encyclopaedic flower companies on wikipedia please. Please read the notability guidelines to see what is acceptable Maustrauser 11:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I have not instered any advertising related links. I have replaced several links with Wiki pages instead. None of the new pages have any external links. All the pages that I have added are of notable services, ranking usually at no. 1 (Google) in their respective categories --RYK 18:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Interflora
A tag has been placed on Interflora, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 05:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Interflora


A tag has been placed on Interflora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Revent talk  12:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

FYI, my nomming this as a speedy was an error on my part, and was (rightly) zapped by another editor. While the article as it currently stands is essentially unsourced and doesn't really explain why Interflora is notable, it does at least make a assertion of notability (that while correct, is grossly out of date and minimal). I've since become aware that while Interflora is essentially unknown in the US, it is actually a notable company, and I wouldn't have tried to A7 it if I'd realized that. Instead I would have fixed it. Revent talk  19:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)