User talk:ReighmundFelicitus

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Homosexuality in the New Testament, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The sources were listed. The texts are plain. What is not clear and what is ambiguous is what about the texts that you think are not acceptable. It's as if you want someone else's work to validate a text, which is the opposite of true scholarship. You can't have a religious writing that is hundreds of years after the original text that will explain it, unless it's the subject of archaeology. However, private interpretation is invalid to support "what" was actually written. ReighmundFelicitus (talk) 04:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * See WP:RSPSCRIPTURE: your interpretation of the Bible is banned by website policy.
 * And, yes, I agree that lesbianism is not a sin in the Old Testament, but you have to WP:CITE mainstream Bible scholars for this claim.
 * &mdash;we never do around here, see WP:VERECUNDIAM. tgeorgescu (talk)  08:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)