User talk:Reihm07

Speedy deletion nomination of Jerome Angelo Santos


A tag has been placed on Jerome Angelo Santos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please refrain from writing autobiographical articles. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged; if you create such an article, it may be deleted. All edits to articles must conform to our policies on no original research, neutral point of view, and avoid conflicts of interest. Please remember that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a personal webspace provider. If your achievements are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Zakhalesh (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Jerome Angelo Santos‎
The article is likely to be deleted, so I'll place my talk page comment here as well so you can see the guidelines which lead to it's nomination for speedy deletion:

The warnings you were given clearly explain the reasons for deletion - the article is unreferenced, and thus is not verifiable, and the subject fails to meet our notability guideline. In addition, you should read about ownership of articles, conflict of interest and neutral point of view. Zakhalesh (talk) 17:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)