User talk:Reinako/sandbox/Wish (company)

Article draft feedback
Hi, I'm happy to see the great work you've done on your article. You've really flushed out a couple of sections! The others left you some good feedback already, and I encourage you to take it.

A couple things to note about this article:


 * It has a "reads like an advertisment" banner. One good way you might be able to improve the article is to make it less promotional and more encyclopedia.
 * Relatedly, I think that since you started working on the article, someone else added a criticism section, with a source from the Atlantic (but the source wasn't formatted properly). A good way to improve the neutrality of the article might be to further improve this section in addition to the sections you are already working on.

Finally, I encourage you to polish your article a bit, with a focus on writing style and clarity. I don't see any particular problems there, its just something that can always be improved. Finally, I think it would be great to add some more Wikilinks to your article. Wikilinks can be a good way to help other editors discover your article. After you publish your article, you might also consider linking to your article from other relevant articles. You should also add your article to any relevant categories. Groceryheist (talk) 02:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review from Amy
Hi Reinako!

My name is Amy, my username is Amytangg. I am one of the peer reviewers assigned to your article.

Overall, I think this is a great first start. It was very informative, and I learned a lot of information I did not know about Wish. I think your tone is good, it is not persuasive and is clearly informative. I think your hierarchy of your sections is also done well. However, I think your sections are very brief and concise already. I'm not sure exactly how much further you can expand on your sections. As for your sources, I think some of them are a little untrustworthy. For example, tamebay.com seems very sketchy. Crunchbase also seems very brief in the information that is provided.

Great job, keep it up!

Amytangg (talk) 05:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi Reinako, I'm the other peer reviewer for your article. This looks great to me as well! I think you have a great start, and I especially love all of the different headers. They're definitely very relevant and are helpful with the organization of the article. I think you could definitely add a lot more content to each section, especially the last one, since it's very brief. Another thing you could add might be pictures to show how it is different than other shopping apps. As a bonus, I personally know that Wish has a mobile and desktop site that are quite different.

Great work on your draft, and good luck editing!

Sunnysideup373 (talk) 06:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)