User talk:Reinosuke

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 10:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Appletrees (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Because Appletrees slanders Japan, a lot of users dislike him. For instance, he tried to apply racist's tag to a famous philosopher Fukuzawa Yukichi in Japan.  Moreover, he made the category of "Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Japan" and "Category:Anti-Korean sentiment in Japan". He only shouted, "You are SOCKS" though a lot of users advised to his attitude. --124.87.134.96 (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Talk:Taekwondo
 * removed dubious source.
 * taekwondo orginization officialy denied Lee's claim. 660gd4qo (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * anyway, are you sock? 660gd4qo (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

POV quote
Neutral point of view

Describing points of view

Quotations

"the quotation is being used to substitute rhetorical language in place of more neutral, dispassionate tone preferred for encyclopedias. This can be a backdoor method of inserting a non-neutral treatment of a controversial subject into Wikipedia's narrative on the subject, and should be avoided." --660gd4qo (talk) 16:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

--660gd4qo (talk) 10:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) these are controvercial POV quotes. because, these quote completely ignore taekwondo also connect to Korean traditional martial arts.
 * 2) Karate is NOT a Japanese origin. It is a China + Ryukyu origin. numerous references support this. so "origins of taekwondo is japan karate" is completely nonsense, and ignoring historical fact.
 * 3) One of the controvercial reference author, Capener, Author changed its view later.
 * 4) modern taekwondo is not made by mr. lee. he is a one of the members. Mr. lee talk officialy denied by kukiwon, and state that it's not proper to use that report as the reference of the history of Taekwondo
 * 5) According to Madis, Eric document, his evidences are taekwondo founder learned karate, uniform is similar with karate. but, author's comment ignoring many facts that taekwondo also influenced by subahk, taekkyon, chinese kungfu and some taekwondo founder was not learned karate.

You just repeat "revert" again like brainless robot, can you doing any effort of discuss? At least, can you show some effort for reach agreement. not disrupting edit war. --660gd4qo (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

You must prove this things... --660gd4qo (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) these are controvercial POV quotes. because, these quote completely ignore taekwondo also connect to Korean traditional martial arts.
 * 2) Karate is NOT a Japanese origin.
 * 3) mr. lee. talk denied by kukkiwon and mr. lee himself.

I'll quote it from the article that I cited.
대표팀 캡틴 구자철도 "골 이후 독도 세리머니를 생각했다. 하지만 할 필요가 없었다.

In English it is "Koo Ja cheol said that "I thought of about a Dokdo ceremony. But there is no need to do it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.96.121.108 (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ishikawa Goemon.jpg


The file File:Ishikawa Goemon.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ishikawa Goemon.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ishikawa Goemon.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)