User talk:Reinventor098

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 01:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Zeitgeist Movement
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tom Harrison Talk 11:40, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

June 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Slp1 (talk) 23:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Please take this 24 hours to carefully read some of these policies and guidelines including in particular edit warring, dispute resolution and no personal attacks. Looking at your edits to date, it seems you have a lot to learn about WP's ways and means. Unfortunately, I foresee further problems ahead unless you radically change your approach to editing here. --Slp1 (talk) 23:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tom Harrison Talk 00:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Zeitgeist Movement, you may be blocked from editing. --Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Blocked for 96 hours
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 96 hours for Edit warring, returning to the exact same pattern and edits that got your blocked the first time.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Why you would return to the exact same pattern is beyond me, so I can only assume you don't hear very well. See you in 4 days I suppose. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;   &copy;  19:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)