User talk:Reishiessence

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル) 18:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Debivort 21:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

testing
test test test

reply re:Lingzhi
Debivort, You recently placed a comment under my discussion section in regards to my updates to the "lingzhi" wiki subject which you deleted. I basically have 2 questions and 1 general commment: 1) Under what authority do you regulate the inputs? Do you work for Wiki? 2) An existing external link also offers products. What are the reasons this link can exist and not mine? I also offer an abundance of additional information on the subject and in fact, I supplied many useful references that are now part of the permanent references section. So far this seems to be some sort of a preferential treatment. At least, be consistent, take both of us out or leave both of us in. I await your answer. Reishi Essence


 * Hello RE - thanks for your references in the article.
 * 1) No particular authority. I no more work for Wiki than you do - I'm not even an administrator. I have just been a regular editor of the encyclopedia for a year or so. I removed your external link because it violated my interpretation of | this part of the Wikipedia policy on external links.
 * 2) The other link should probably be removed. The only reason I removed yours is that I started keeping an eye on this article after the first link was there, but before yours was - no other preference than that. I'll get to removing the other external link soon.
 * Hope this answers your questions, and that you'll become a regular editor. Debivort 02:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)