User talk:Relieu

Ref canvassing
Please slow down on the link canvassing; while some of those links are probably appropriate (e.g., this addition of a photo collection), I don't think it's useful to add lecture links that appear to be accessible to people affiliated with UCSD. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't know what you mean by "link-canvassing" I am adding relevant content in the form of external links to library online sources to pages-people-places discussed in the audio and visual material. Even if an item is initially described as "ucsd only" it can be requested by an outside individual if they would like to view the material. Happy to explain more if needed. Relieu (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Canvassing refs to a single site is edging into WP:REFSPAM territory. I question how useful many of those links are if someone has to request access, which will the case for the vast majority of our readers. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:38, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I read your link to citation spamming and that is not what i am doing. I work for an academic library and I am adding links to objects in our digital collection - not linking to our general digital collection page - that are content of or by the wikipedia page mentioned.  Rhe science-people are links to lectures given by these well-know scientists.  the Papua New Guinea wiki-pages link to images, films and sound recordings of the people and places listed on the Wikipedia pages. These are valuable academic sources, that's why they are a part of the digital library.  It's NOT linking a bunch of pages to one single site and you assumed. Relieu (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Declaring a conflict-of-interest
Hello, Relieu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not linking to my employer - I am linking to primary source material. I can understand if I just posted a link to my Library's website on each and every entry- but I am not doing that.  There is wiki page about a person and we have primary source material of this person speaking and I am linking to that resource. Or there is a wiki page about a place and I am linking to a collection of photographs of that place. I am adding citations and primary source material to add facts to the wiki. Relieu (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Museum curators, librarians, archivists, and similar are encouraged to help improve Wikipedia, or to share their information in the form of links to their resources.  If a link cannot be used as a reliable source, it may be placed under further reading or external links if it complies with the external links guideline. Bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. Relieu (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)