User talk:Religiouswog

June 2014
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Thor because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 07:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loki. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Loki was changed by Religiouswog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942161 on 2014-06-23T13:10:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roman funerals and burial, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Roman funerals and burial was changed by Religiouswog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859735 on 2014-06-23T13:23:23+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Kusma (t·c) 13:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
Hi. A checkuser investigation has confirmed that you used four illegitimate sockpuppet accounts (,, , and ) in order to vandalize several articles. These four sockpuppet accounts have all been indefinitely blocked. If you continue vandalizing Wikipedia — using either your original account (this account, ) or any new sockpuppet accounts — you can expect to have your original account blocked, possibly for a lengthy period, in order to protect Wikipedia from harm. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:18, 4 July 2014 (UTC)