User talk:Remagine/Archive1

REMAGINE vandalism
Don't remove deletion tags from articles you created. It will get you blocked.WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 23:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Problem
Having two accounts is frowned upon. If you do, it should be clearly noted that they belong to the same person. Using an alternate account to avoid a block is bad. Please read WP:SOCK. WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 23:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

REMAGINE
As it stands now, the article no longer appears as blatant advertising so your removal of the advertisement tag is okay in my book. It doesn't, however, currently show notability enough for inclusion based upon the guidelines at WP:CORP. I realize that there are a bunch of policies and guidelines, but we are trying to keep Wikipedia from turning into the Yellow Pages. Please review the above guidelines. If your company meets them, please include that information. If the article doesn't contain notability information in a couple of days, it will most likely be deleted as non notable, through the Articles for deletion process. Also, please sign your comments by putting ~ at the end of your posts. WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 23:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Remagine's notability
I was hoping for sources to assert Remagine's notability, not its founders. Thank you! -- Perfecto 00:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * See Notability (companies and corporations). (I'm sorry, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not the yellow pages.)  Thank you for your note.  -- Perfecto  01:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm really sorry that several people seems to be against you. (I think your username is attracting the attention.) I do hope you can contribute in other ways than writing about your company. Thank you. -- Perfecto 01:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

deleting tags
Please do not delete tags from articles (such as the ) without community consensus (via the article talk page). If you continue such unilateral actions, you will very likely find yourself blocked. -Lanoitarus (talk) .:. 01:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Believe me, I would love to contribute to this system, but my first experience has not been a pleasant one. My first impression is seeing wikipedia as a dictatorship. Thanks Remagine 02:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * No, it was removed by you, less than 2 minutes after it was added by an administrator. Wikipedia is not a dictatorship, but that includes for you. Go by discussion and consensus and youll do fine. -Lanoitarus (talk) .:. 02:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

QUESTION?
I have fixed the article countless times (REMAGINE). Made it so it doesnt read like an add and more of and informational page but yet the advertisment tag keeps being added. what gives?Remagine 01:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Your article does read like an advertisement, and is not of a neutral point of view either. Onthost 02:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Since when do definitions or encyclopedia entries speak from opinion rather than factual information? It should be from a neutral point, its defining the truth. Remagine 02:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * If your serious about writing an article about your company please read WP:CORP. Your company does not meet the nobility requirements, and it violates note #1: "Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service". Onthost 02:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

3rr Warning
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -Lanoitarus (talk) .:. 02:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)