User talk:RemoteControl97

Welcome!
Hello, RemoteControl97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history at Sean Hannity shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Niteshift36 (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Niteshift36 (talk) 14:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Sean Hannity
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Try a Request for Comments
Please see the comments on your request at the dispute resolution noticeboard for moderated discussion of Sean Hannity. You made requests for two different dispute resolution processes at the same time, which is contrary to a rule that you probably didn't know about, which is that you should not request dispute resolution when there is already a dispute resolution process going on. So the real question is what method of dispute resolution to use. With the large number of participants, the case is probably too large to manage with the informal mediation of DRN. On the other hand, some of the parties don't want to submit to formal mediation. At the same time, I am not sure that there is much need to discuss, only to decide. So I suggest that you request help from a neutral editor with experience in wording Requests for Comments, and ask the community whether to include the language about Hal Turner. It is really a yes-no question, not a matter for discussion. I am willing to help word the RFC, or someone else at DRN or RFM can help. That is my thought at this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)