User talk:Remote peace

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. mynameinc 03:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

The Used
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  03:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * Blogs and YouTube videos are not reliable sources, as you have indicated here and here. Further reversions will result in a lengthier block. Take this to the discussion page to discuss the merits of the sources. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  13:36, 3

January 2009 (UTC)

to reviewing admin. This user was not blocked for the reason stated in the unblock request. He was blocked for being a sock puppet of User:USEDfan Landon1980 (talk) 03:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)