User talk:Removingbias

October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Discovery Institute have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Discovery Institute was changed by Removingbias (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912567 on 2021-10-15T15:50:47+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Discovery Institute, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh (talk) 15:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

But there is such a clear bias.
Can you add that it is pseudoscientific to atheists? This article is clearly biased and one-sided. Removingbias (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is pseudoscientific, not just to atheists. Even amongst Christians, ID is a minority viewpoint, one not backed by science. - Aoidh (talk) 15:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

To be totally clear, Wikipedia endeavours to reflect how subjects are covered in mainstream reliable sources. It does not seek to give equal status to fringe views. If you wish to call that "bias", you are free to do so. Wikipedia also does not seek to misrepresent fringe fundamentalist religious views as being the only religious view. JBW (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Witness Kenneth R. Miller and John F. Haught for expert RC views on ID, and John E. Jones III for careful assessment from a Lutheran. Perhaps your own bias is showing? . . dave souza, talk 16:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)