User talk:Renaissancee/Archives/1

Campus Superstar Season 3
Act smart. Jamiebijania (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiebijania (talk • contribs) 02:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Khowar
Please refer to my comments on the discussion page for Khowar. I have deleted the paragraphs about Mr. Aziz because his personal works and details are not crucial to Khowar literature and are best treated on a separate page. You do not open up the page on English and see the personal details of authors appear, the same standard must be maintained for Khowar. Thanks,--Fred_Bolor

You keep reverting my edits on Diamond Creek. Have you seen the garbage you're putting back onto the page? - Evilio

Rollback
Please be more careful when reverting. Thanks. —  Aitias  // discussion 23:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Likewise, this mistaken revert greatly concerns me.  Considering I am now the third admin in as many days to express concern regarding your inappropriate reverts, would you like to reassure me that this will never happen again?  Otherwise I may be forced to revoke your rollbacker status or take more drastic steps in order to protect the project.  --Kralizec! (talk) 03:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Image Replacement
This commet is from File talk:HesABullyCharlieBrown.jpg.

This Image needs to be replaced with a screenshot of the title, is there anybody who is able to accept my request? 68.34.4.143 (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Steven Febey
No, it is not vandalisim. The sport is called Australian rules football, not AFL. AFL is the name of the governing body 60.224.3.8 (talk) 01:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I really don't know how you did that. I was merely trying to remove the use of "AFL" to refer to Australian football. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.3.8 (talk) 02:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

No Problem
All in a days work Wysprgr2005 (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Pawan Kalyan.
Hey. I know you made a big addition to the article, but i undid it because it had no references. Find references and then make the changes. Thanks.Prabhodh (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Lyle Saxon
I appreciate that you recognized your own error on the Lyle Saxon page, but would you mind removing your warning message from my talk page, or writing a brief apology there? 75.68.65.9 (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
I got a final warning for vandalism for this edit. I didn't do it! I'm a Wikipedia reader, occasional fixer of obvious typos, and every once in a while I add information about bands I have knowledge of from my career as a musician. Wading into a controversy about Mormonism would be high on my list of things that aren't worth the trouble.

How do I get off double-secret probation for this? Blank Frank (talk) 23:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

THE EDIT I MADE WAS CONSTRUCTIVE! IF YOU HAD ACTUALLY LOOKED IN HISTORY AND CHECKED MY REASONING, AND THEN CHECKED THE EDIT, INSTEAD OF JUST DOING A KNEEJERK REVERT WITHOUT ACTUALLY CHECKING, YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT! I AM FIXING IT FOR A THIRD TIME! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.211.103 (talk) 01:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

VANDALISM.
'sup? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.27.156 (talk) 07:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Sebastian Grace
- 	I was pointing out that it was an attempt at vandalism; what I wrote wasn't vandalism itself. There are a few people attempting to pass off some articles associated with this name as fact, when it's fiction from a TV show. It's been discussed in talked and recommended for deletion, and they are getting rid of the recommendation and continuing to repost the article. Is there a better way for me to redo this article? --Abdul Muhib (talk) 07:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. The previous statements that this was a fictional article were included in the history, not the talk, and were in the companion page- the originator of this article created two identical pages with similar titles. Sorry I was not clearer on that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdul Muhib (talk • contribs) 07:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

The Massacre
Thanks, I just realized I missed a bit there. :-) Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

re: Your Message
In your message on my talk page, you gave me a template warning about this edit on user Rootology's talk page. Did you mean to, or was it a mistake? --     01:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Rootology
Hey heads up on your rollback on User talk:Rootology, please check the history as you rolled back my removal of Vandalism. ;) --Djcam (talk) 01:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Its all good, dotn worry about it ;). --Djcam (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Renaissancee. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete The clonewars list, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G1 because of the following concern: While I did delete it as G6, because it was a copy of List of Star Wars: The Clone Wars episodes, you have to be more careful with your tagging. It was certainly not patent nonsense because that only applies if the content is completely without any meaning or sense. Here the meaning was pretty clear. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards  So Why  09:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to my user page
Please review and remove the warning from my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.102.210 (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Your deletion of David Goldman withdraws
David Goldman was set to be a 4 year varsity starter in every year at friends, was school president, and was pretty much the coolest guy around. His withdrawal has hit everyone hard. Please it is indeed an important event and deserves to be on the timeline. Please do not delete the post for misuse again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.183.31 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Your deletion of David Goldman withdraws
I see your point but consider this. Who is most likely to view an article about the Friends School of Baltimore? A person with at least some knowledge of the school. If this person was looking for more information about the school one of the people they would need to know about would be David Goldman. And also consider that it means a lot more to us to have it up there than it means to you to not have it up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.183.31 (talk) 02:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I did not libel anyone
Libel is against people. I did not libel anyone. I did provide a source. It is Wikipedia! Wells Fargo Bank (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Re-edits to War of Jenkins Ear
Edits to the War of Jenkins' Ear

All English and British forces are either called Anglo, English or GB. There was no British-Spanish War, only Anglo-Spainish. Thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 01:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mauicelt"

In 1707 the Parliaments of Scotland and England were united and the country became known as the United Kingdom of Great Britain. Men from England, Scotland, Wales and England and Ireland, thought they would not be included untill 1801, served with the Army and Navy. Since the dictionary definition of "Anglo" is "of or pertaining to the English" I think it is grossly misleading to, and in my opinion racist, to label any conflict after 1707 as being Anglo. In fact I would further argue that the "Anglo" prefix should not be used after the Union of the Crowns in 1603 when the King of Scots became King of England and Scots regiments saw more and more service alongside their English and Welsh counterparts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauicelt (talk • contribs) 02:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)