User talk:Renaissancevan

You cannot make these kind of allegations on the Gary Winnick article without a credible, reliable source. See WP:BLP for our policy on biographies of living persons and WP:RS for policy on reliable sources. Do not re-add this material without satisfying both policies. Exxolon (talk) 01:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've heavily edited your contributions. Most of the information related to the Global Crossing company itself rather than Winnick - I suggest you re-add it over there. I've had to pare down the other info to the bare facts - Winnick had a fine recommended, the SEC rejected, he contributed $55 mil to settle a class action with no admission of wrong doing. We have to be very conservative - we can't speculate on his sources of wealth nor can we mention an irrelevant association with someone either. Exxolon (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edits are being discussed at WT:BLPN
Hello Renaissancevan. See a discussion at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. You are welcome to add your own opinion there. EdJohnston (talk) 04:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of William Walter (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Walter (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William Walter (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  22:21, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WilliamWalter.jpg


The file File:WilliamWalter.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)