User talk:Renamed user 3237487304/Archives/2022/May

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Crowd estimation
I guess there was already a crowd estimate for the CDO rally and it was at 150,000 attendees and at the Pampanga which is 320,000 Nbg2022 (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Crowd estimate
I guess there was already a crowd estimate at the CDO rally at 150,000 and at the Pampanga which is 320,000 attendees Nbg2022 (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

2022 presidential campaign endorsements
Thanks so much for adding endorsements to the different candidates of the 2022 Philippine presidential election. Really appreciate it! But please be reminded of the following: I hope I do not come across as condescending or anything similar. I just want to help you as a member of the Wikipedia community. I acknowledge that I myself am not a perfect contributor and that I am also learning, so I hope we can help each other. I really appreciate your additions, as we really need to update information related to the election as soon as we get them and as soon as we can. Once again, thank you very much. signed,Pat talk 08:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * For current/former representatives, we are trying to link to the new set of pages for congressional districts. We are slowly retiring from linking to pages like Legislative districts of Bulacan or Legislative district of Las Piñas and replacing them with Bulacan's 1st congressional district or Las Piñas's at-large congressional district. We hope you can help by linking to those pages instead in your future contributions.
 * A few weeks ago, I messaged you here regarding the use of proper date formats in accordance with the common date format in the Philippines of MM-DD-YYYY. In this edit, you still use an incorrect format, and a deprecated one for that matter, in the sources you cited. I am just kindly reminding you of this and I hope that you will be able to comply.