User talk:Renamed user 5417514488/archive 9

User: Nadia Kittel
Thanks. This was only a test.

John Cusack
Hi and thanks for that "warm" welcome. ;-) Unfortunately, I quoted a wrong cite - sorry and thanks for your second message. That "girl names"-fact is quite useless, of course, but in fact, it's true. Just to let you know I'm not doing any harm. ;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EagleSGE (talk • contribs) 01:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC).

authoritative tone
You asked me to elaborate on my comment. I don't remember exactly the things I saw that prompted me to leave you a note - but I do remember seeing lots of people being offended and put aback by the way you addressed their comments. I'm not gonna look into the specifics, I just ask that you keep in mind to not bite newbs, or anyone for that matter. Was just a friendly note, i think... Fresheneesz 23:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Happy new year to you too! Fresheneesz 02:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

archive
hi

how do i archive

--Falcon866 22:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

¶ū€$†¡ΘП$
Hello, Yuser31415! I was wondering if you answer the following questions for me on my talk page. Why do users put !vote (with a ! before the word vote)? And what does Wdefcon show? Thanks a lot for your help and happy editing! SD31415  (SIGN HERE)  17:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Questions were answered by Deskana (talk • contribs). SD31415  (SIGN HERE)  17:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't blame me for still watching your talk page :-) --Deskana (For Great Justice!)  17:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That's okay; I was offline at the time, so I appreciate you answering them anyway!

main {    printf("Thanks!\n"); return 0; }
 * 1) include 
 * (Hope that's the correct program in C.) Cheers! Yuser31415 19:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Godwaud
What's offensive about that username? --Charlesknight 21:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe but then we'd have to ban Godfrey, Godwin etc. --Charlesknight 22:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: warning
It wasn't a personal attack. I just want him to stop mindless reverts. I have nothing to do with anyone personally. Szhaider 23:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * See history of Iqbal. See how many times I have asked him to discuss and how many times he reverted without any valid resposnse. By the way, he has full support of Indian Admins, therefore, it is not easy to deter him. Szhaider 23:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a personal attack. I had no such intention. Szhaider 23:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Yabasic peer review
I could see in the history thta you remover the peer review of yabasic again? Why? DarkLoki 14:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I see, that's ok. Was just wondering what happend ;-) DarkLoki 20:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

What a relief
It's a relief to have you following me around. Or at least, you seem to be. I approve either way. Thank you, seriously. If you ever need anything from me, such as administrator-related guidance (you're a budding admin, of course) or a second opinion on anything, please don't hesitate to ask. --Deskana (For Great Justice!)  21:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do feel like I'm walking on eggshells occasionally. Sometimes it is just a better idea to realise that you're walking on eggshells and smash them with avengance, but knowing when to do that is what sets a good admin apart from a desysopped one. I like to err on the side of caution sometimes. Thank you for following me around, please do continue to do so. It's reassuring to know I have backup, especially when I sometimes feel like I'm surrounded by vandals/eggshells/etc. --Deskana (For Great Justice!)  21:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Reply: Warning users for removing their warning messages
Um, we never finished our discussion. I asked you a question, which was something like: "So, can I remove/blank everything from my user talk page?" You yourself said something like, "there aren't any significant policies/rules about removing warnings, so you won't be warned." Right? Thanks for your time, Your enemy 14:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * From what I understand, you say that there isn't any specific policy/rule/guideline that inforces this, so... can I blank my entire talk page then? User:Recoome wants to start blanking his talk page also... So AS LONG AS SOMEGUY0830 OR DESKANA OR ANYONE ELSE ISN'T BOTHERED BY IT, (actually, can you confirm this with them since they're your friends?) Then I'll start blanking... ... PL(DB) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Look, I told Recoome specifically not to remove his warnings until I were to find out that if we can even remove them or not. I'm not harrassing (in any way, shape, or form) but just letting him know about what's going on and givin' him a heads up. Besides, we both really want to remove all of the warnings and comments we've ever received before. You say that we would be frowned upon by an arbitration commitee (I'm guessing by the mastermind Jim Wales and his team of administrators, right?) but would we be blocked upon also? This is why I want you to confirm this with Deskana and Someguy0830 (and possibly others that watch me) since they're the ones who almost always have to deal with me... PL(DB) 19:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)