User talk:Renamed user 6711318693614

From the Now-blocked Edit Warrior
Drmies is awfully similar to Diermier. Given Wikipedia's commitment to compiling accessible, accountable, credible information, I find it strange that you're committed to maintaining incomplete, questionable, libellous record on an undergraduate student's Wikipedia page. I don't believe that referring to someone as an "ex-student" is particularly productive or neutral.

I'm working in good faith and am staunchly against your disinformation scheme. Contrary to your unfounded suspicions, I am not a meatpuppet. I just have moral clarity. You are making personal attacks, which-- if I recall correctly-- is grounds for being blocked. Notice how I'm not going Twinkle on you. Seek my talk page.

LadyInClogs (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You could have made your case on the article talk page--you didn't. You could have explained how that content is libelous, on the article talk page or on the relevant noticeboard, WP:BLPN--you didn't. You could also have refrained from calling me a "vandalfascist", and if you wish to explain what "Diermier" is, I suppose you can. If you wish to discuss matters on the noticeboard, for instance, you can place an unblock request, and I don't mind changing this block to a partial block only for the article, but you'll have to actually show good faith: no edit warring, no insults. I don't like being called a fascist, and calling someone that is indeed a personal attack. Drmies (talk) 15:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Petocz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. gobonobo + c 22:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 22:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Autieethnography
Hello, Renamed user 6711318693614. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Autieethnography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)