User talk:Renamed user 8262690166681

I'd be happy if someone would start a discussion with me. Please feel free to write something here.--Andy (talk) 01:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:D on brochure-1.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:D on brochure-1.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add  to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Thank you. --Bbb23 (talk) 02:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved it to User:Andrewudstraw/sandbox. I really urge you to get a better picture of this person; perhaps you can find his email address here. Drmies (talk) 04:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Um. Excuse me?!  What a couple of jerks.  This is why Wikipedia has such a poor reputation and why I don't participate much!--MoebiusFlip (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what happens when two cacti tag-team you. You get twice the pricks.

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:AndrewStraw.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Children of Camp LeJeune


A tag has been placed on Children of Camp LeJeune requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 00:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC) A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Andrewudstraw/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Gosh, now I realize you are just a trouble maker. I set this up on my sandbox so I can work on it without interference and get it to a level that is encyclopedic. What is your problem? This is the kind of hostility that makes me not rely on Wikipedia. I know it is run by a bunch of control freaks who can't stand someone participating who isn't a "regular." That's ok. People will see it on TV and wonder why it isn't on Wikipedia. Not notable, I guess.--AndrewStraw (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind
Promotional material is not allowed anywhere, including sandboxes. Before making any edits concerning yourself or your political or other activities, please read the guidelines Conflict of interest and Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Please heed this advice. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)