User talk:Renamed user 864c542a23313621/Archive 11

Islamabad United in 2016
Hi, I was just wondering why you undid my edit to Islamabad United in 2016? I realise now (now that I'm not making edits at 1:00am, that is) that the template I used should have either linked to the Merge discussion I started on Talk:Islamabad United in 2016 or put the merge discussion at Talk:Islamabad United, but I see no reason to remove the template rather than just correct the link, as the discussion is not actually closed. Anyway, I figured it's probably because of my mistake with the link in the template, so I thought I would let you know that I will be moving my merge discussion to the correct talk page and replacing the template on the Islamabad United in 2016 article. Thanks! The preceding post was a special message from Her Majesty, the Queen of   Awesome  07:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy move
Hey, just letting you know that I declined the speedy move request. It was originally a redirect to the disambiguation page Love Game and it actually looks like there are six other uses of this title on Wikipedia, so it'd make more sense to have this remain a redirect to the disambiguation page for the time being. If the film becomes big then it could probably be moved, but right now it doesn't really seem like it's major enough to warrant being the main search target for the term. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * There is no other film named Love Games.-- Musa  Talk  06:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * No, but there are two albums, a television show, and three songs that use the title. (Four of these have articles.) If this was just "Love Games (film)" (where the article is currently located) then that wouldn't be a problem, but in this case it's the general name "Love Games", which does have some mentions on Wikipedia and so far the film doesn't appear to be major enough to where it'd be the most obvious search topic. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Basically, right now the general, generic term "Love Games" is best served as a redirect to the disambiguation page since there are many things with this title. If it was specific to one given format (film, TV, etc) then that'd be different, but it's not and you need to be able to justify that this film would be the most likely, obvious redirect target as opposed to the disambiguation page or any of the items on the page. When the film releases and gains more coverage it might be a different story, but for right now I don't see where the coverage is major enough to justify this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I didn't noticed the albums and television shows.-- Musa  Talk  08:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy
A3 does not apply to articles such as Alamgir Khan (activist). It falls into none of they groups " article that contains no content whatsoever, or consists only of external links, category tags, a "see also" section, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, chat-like comments, template tags, and/or images". The person may or may not be notable, and the article would need expansion if he is, but it is not a speedy A3. It says who he is, it says where he works, it says what he does, and it gives references for  all that information   DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Sonakshi Sinha
Since it offends you so much, I'll let rapper be but i'm removing the singer status and don't revert it. I have a reference for you. .

Speedy deletion nomination of Farah Karimaee


A tag has been placed on Farah Karimaee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I did see you created this after putting this up-if you want you could make it a redirect till she gets more notable. Wgolf (talk) 05:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Teraa Surroor poster (February 2016).jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Teraa Surroor poster (February 2016).jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Skr15081997 (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Senti Aur Mental


The article Senti Aur Mental has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence filming has begun, does not meet WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 12:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

File:TERAA SURROOR Poster 2.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TERAA SURROOR Poster 2.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Waiting (Bollywood film).jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waiting (Bollywood film).jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Rhythm (2016).jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhythm (2016).jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Rhythm (2016 film).jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhythm (2016 film).jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Sanam Teri Kasam old poster.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sanam Teri Kasam old poster.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Sanam Teri Kasam Poster 2.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sanam Teri Kasam Poster 2.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Mann Mayal (2016).jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mann Mayal (2016).jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Don't make me understand what is right and what is wrong. You must help me how to edit wiki pages! I think you understand now HeArTeOuS BhUtTa (talk) 16:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Teraa Surroor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Agree that you add sources to your edits, but please check if they are verifiable. WP:Sources. Thanks.    Nair sp ec ht ' (talk) 08:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Mann Mayal Episodes
In the article WP:Episode, move to Process for creating articles on television episodes there scroll to the Process section and read the first two lines.Sammy.joseph (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

When there is only one season, the episodes are merged in the parent article! When the article renews for second season, the episodes are then listed separately. What you are trying to inform me s only possible when there is enough sources, It is usually neglected as there must be vast majority of sources enough to prove every singly line of episode! This does not mean we add Imdb links, review It or Hip in Pakistan reviews. Even written episodes are not allowed. Pakistani TV series mostly have less sources and even international shows consisting of one season only don't consist of list articles. Secondly in WP:Episode, they have mentioned that series having less TRUSTED sources of episodes and Consisting one season only should have there episode section in Parent article. Please add the merger tag back. Sammy.joseph (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TERAA SURROOR Poster 2.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:TERAA SURROOR Poster 2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Adam Saleh and Sheikh Akbar
Hi, adding Adam Saleh and Sheikh Akbar as partners in the infobox is not appropriate unless you have sources in support of them being live-in partners/common law spouses rather than comedy partners.

Please read Template:Infobox person which states: "If particularly relevant, or if the partner is notable; "partner" here means unmarried life partners (of any gender or sexual preference), not business partner. Use the format Name (1950–present) for current partner and Name (1970–99) for former partner(s)." Take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * They both started together on a single YouTube chanel and splitted up in May 2015. See these sources  I don't think it is inappropriate to add it cuz they began together.--  Musa  Talk  14:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure this is due to a lack of WP:COMPETENCE rather than WP:IDHT. However, as I've already explained, it's irrelevant whether "they started together and then splitted up" because ""partner" here means unmarried life partners".


 * Therefore, do you have any sources which states they were "unmarried life partners"? If you don't, then I suggest you revert your changes or I will have no option but to take this to WP:ANI. Tanbircdq (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

ITN for 2016 Lahore suicide bombing
-- Spencer T♦ C 07:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Tipu Sharif
Please don't use no for this purpose. Thank you &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)