User talk:Renamed user 943a06d1c3/archive2017

February 2016
Sila jangan menyumbang teks dalam Bahasa Melayu ke Wikipedia Bahasa Inggeris. Sumbangan anda dipersilakan dalam Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu. Please do not contribute text in Malay to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Malay Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Short questions.
If there is an articles with only one or more sentences only, and it was categorized as stub, is it allowed in Wikipedia or not? Example articles are like this. Thanks for advance.

NgYShung (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If they are still not notable, of course, yes; for example, the one above is a local public school which are in fact notable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Sir, why would you undid my work on Hassan Alrahib which was correct? Aalnafia1 (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't find any page called Hassan Alrahib, and any rollback on your contributions. Do you had mistaken the user you are looking for? And please make a new section, thanks. NgYShung (talk) 12:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

NPP
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm, but please do not patrol new pages or tag pages (Articles for deletion/Sekolah Datuk Keramat 1) until you have significantly more experience; maintenance tasks are not for new users. Consider instead concentrating on building  the encyclopedia by adding new content or even trying your hand at creating a new article. If you need any help, don't hesitate tomask me on my talk page. Happy editing ! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your advice, Kudpung. I will keep this in mind. NgYShung (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * And yet you passed Silicon Park Africa despite it being copied verbatim from siliconpark.io. The promotional tone of its language should have flagged that to you. PLEASE take more care. for (talk)  13:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello NgYShung, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to SP Half Marathon has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. for (talk)  16:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Gilfort Mabitsela/sandbox
Hello NgYShung. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Gilfort Mabitsela/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is not an attack page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops! Sorry for that. I was going to tag WP:G11 actually. Butterfingers maybe? I will double check next time, thanks for reminding. NgYShung  huh? 09:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not really G11 either, it's not that promotional. WP:CSD perhaps, as it's original research, but it's in a sandbox and not doing any harm - less BITEy to explain to the new user why it's unsuitable, and maybe tag later. I'll do that.


 * There is good advice about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Tahir Software Developer
Users are allowed to blank their user pages. Please read WP:BLANKING. --Neil N  talk to me 10:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Reply to my talk page. Please reply on my talk page.
What is the probability of a user being blocked for vandalizing the sandbox (note: the potential user in mind hasn't removed the header)? 95.49.119.177 (talk) 12:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Replied in your talk page. NgYShung  huh? 12:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

NPP
SECOND REQUEST: Please stop patrolling new pages or tagging pages until you have significantly more experience; maintenance tasks are not for new users. Consider instead concentrating on building  the encyclopedia by adding new content or even trying your hand at creating a new article. If you continue to tag pages, you may find that your editing privileges will be affected. If you need any help, don't hesitate to mask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry but I think I did not (actively) patrol pages since your first request. I placed more speedy deletion tags instead of maintenance tags now. But still, I actually planned to create a new article after my exam, thanks for your advice. NgYShung  huh? 10:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Precisely, that is the problem. You stil very much lack sufficient experence to be placing any  tags or deletion tags on  article. PLease now refrain. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

How to deal with legal threats
Hi, I noted in the AN/I thread you opened you seemed unsure on how to deal with legal threats when you come across them. When replying, it's best only to remind the editor that WP:NLT applies, report it at AN/I and then disengage from any further communication - which I note you did, so thank you. Keep in mind that sometimes the people making these threats are genuinely upset individuals, who would benefit from a polite and calm explanation of WP:NLT with links to the contact page. Thank you for your continued contributions here -- samtar talk or stalk 10:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Automatically add template to articles
Is there any way to automatically add template tag to articles listed in the template. I created Template:Schools in Kedah, Malaysia and Template:Schools in Johor, Malaysia and wish to automatically add the template into the articles rather than manually edit every page. Thanks for advance, NgYShung  huh? 04:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To my knowledge, there is not, no, so the only way I know is to add them to each article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, this is B.W. Powe and his wife writing to you
The changes we have made in the wikipedia entry on me are accurate, authorized, complete, and not to be altered. This is important for the following reasons: 1) I have two books appearing in 2016 2) Links will be made to and from publishers' sites 3) Readers will be searching for authorized material online 4) I am beginning my teaching semester at York University in September; this site must be accurate for students to access 5) I am speaking at the University of Toronto "McLuhan Then and Now" Conference in October. Again my authorized information needs to be on the wikipedia.

Please stop reverting to older information sources. Yours truly, BW Powe August 16th, 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.W. Powe (talk • contribs) 16:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, sorry if that bother you as you are really new to Wikipedia, but thanks for talking to me here. Firstly, through your edits, you had added tons of content without any references. The infobox was broken and one of the title was all caps which made the whole article really bad to read because of bad formatting. One of the user who is an admin (Materialscientist) also reverted the edit.


 * Your reasons you had given are okay, but the real problem was you did not cite any of the content you made and it probably violates Manual of Style. The articles must be appear clean and readable. Though you can make a website and add anything you want without Wikipedia WP:RULES, we will add the website link it to the article! Consider you are a new user, you should read WP:WELCOME, WP:REF and also WP:YOURSELF. Happy editing! NgYShung  huh? 06:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Sirte (2016)
I saw your warning and thank you for that. I am well aware of the 1RR rule applied to any ISIL-related articles and stopped after I made only 1 revert. However, the other editor that you warned made 2 reverts (contrary to 1RR). I warned him of this and he started making personal attacks (extremely negative attitude) on my talk page, saying I was threatening him and having a bossy attitude (just because I warned him of WP policy on civility, personal attacks, good faith and 1RR). The same editor broke the 1RR rule for ISIL-related articles two times last night and was warned of this by another editor as well but did not take the warning into account at all. He was also warned of not making personal attacks against others once more earlier this month. I ask for your advice or any help that could resolve this situation. EkoGraf (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I'm busy and I can't go through the dispute because it was a bit long (and also not good on judging dispute). I've requested help at WP:DRR so others' user help may come soon. Thanks, NgYShung  huh? 11:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shri Rang Avadhoot Question
Hello, I saw your warning in Shri Rang Avadhoot page. Then, I added a one reference in this page and also delete the tag after adding the reference. If there is any wrong step in this editing, please tell me because I'm new user in Wikipedia. Thanks for best support. Jydpseo
 * Thanks for talking to me here! I am greatly appreciate for creating the Shri Rang Avadhoot article. References are very important for verifiability of an article. I accepted your remove on the PROD tag, but you should talk to me first so I can remove the tag (because normally the author of an article should not remove the PROD tag). Since you're new here, here some pages you should read: WP:YFA and WP:CITE. And also remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~ ). Happy editing! NgYShung  huh? 07:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jydppatel Question
Hello, How to solve "Sockpuppet investigation"? I see this message on my talk page but i have no idea to solve it. Please help me to solve it. Jydpseo (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The "Sockpuppet investigation" means the use of multiple account to mislead, vandalise etc. Don't worry, if you are really sure that you now only have one account, and you did not own the account (which in this case, Jydppatel), the case will be close (if identified you did not own the account by CheckUser) and you won't be judged or banned. You can see WP:SOCK and also this. Thanks for asking, NgYShung  huh? 10:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Dealing with attack pages
Hi. You recently tagged as WP:CSD a page with a title like "X is a sad ugly boy". Two things about that: A new user who starts off with an attack page is unlikely to be a useful contributor, and I myself would not bother with a "welcome" message - just uw-attack. In this case, I have fixed the attacker's talk page so that his victim's name is no longer visible - just letting you know for next time. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For an attack page like that, you should use WP:CSD, which puts the page in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and also blanks it so that the content is no longer visible.
 * Where the victim's name is visible in the title, and particularly where the title is itself an attack, in your messages to the article author it's best not to use templates which repeat the title. {{subst:uw-attack}} is the best one to use and does not leave the victim's name visible.
 * Okay, I will take note next time. Thanks, NgYShung  huh? 08:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

RE: Home Credit Philippines article
Hello Ng!

Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia. I'm still quite new, so there are many things still to explore and learn, but I am having a very good time in taking everything all in. :)

I just wanted to make a gentle clarification regarding the removal of the article I had created: Home Credit Philippines. I do understand the Wikipedia rules regarding encyclopedic writing, so I very much strived to be as factual and as objective as possible in developing the article, including quoting reputable sources (mainly top-tier media outlets from our country), and making sure that the content itself is non-subjective. If you still have access to that draft (not sure if it is possible), you will see that the sections of the article-- general overview, history of the company, information about the product and partners-- are all quite objective and non-hard sell.

In fact, I used the Wiki pages of some of Home Credit's partners-- such as OPPO and Samsung, both of which were hyperlinked in my article draft-- as a benchmark, since their pages are still very much approved and existing on Wikipedia. :)

Hope you can shed some light on this, and appreciate any advice you might have to help the next draft be more Wikipedia-worthy.

Thanks again!

Warm regards,

Jbmangahas (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for commenting here. Just some advice here, you should read WP:YFA as a start-up. The article you created contains advertising content which is not allowed in Wikipedia. And you should not copy content from another website as it violates the website owner's copyright and normally contains soapboxing content. If you want to get the article back (which in this case Home Credit Philippines), you can ask for an undeletion but you need to delete the soapbox content. I hope you enjoy at Wikipedia! Happy editing, NgYShung  huh? 07:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Ng! To clarify, I did not copy content from another website-- neither the media articles that have been cited as sources, nor the OPPO and Samsung wikipedia entries that I had mentioned. The Home Credit Philippines article contains all original content, with media citations to verify the accuracy of the information provided. thanks!

Jbmangahas (talk) 03:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Propose renaming articles?
Is there anything similar like Categories for discussion/Log/2016 July 11 but it is for articles? Like propose renaming article. Article is only for deletion but WP:ATD doesn't fit. Thanks for advance, NgYShung  huh? 11:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Try WP:Requested moves and the linked pages. Huon (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Malaysia
Hi,

Thanks for that announcement on the WikiProject Malaysia thing. I've been also trying to revive Malaysia Wikipedia, because it has not been active compared to other countries' Wikipedia. I've made two Wikipedia Meetups recently (Meetup/Johor 1 and Meetup/Kuala Lumpur 1), and also take a lot of photos in Malaysia in Wikimedia Commons. There are just so many things need to be done for Wikipedia Malaysia. Chongkian (talk) 00:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, let's make it active again! Still I hope that we can bring back the old WikiProject. I retouched everything in the WikiProject pages and subpages so yeah! :) Maybe go invite some active Malaysian user or user who actively work on Malaysia-associated articles, let's make our dreams come true. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 06:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And also Happy Malaysia Independence day! NgYShung  huh? 07:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And also try to join this Meetup/Malaysia page (can put your name there in the list), in which we discuss all of the upcoming meetup. We plan to make another one soon, probably in Selangor. And also not only the English one, we are trying to make the Malay-speaking meetup as well, to heavily improve the ms.wikipedia which is still lagging behind. ~ Happy Merdeka! Chongkian (talk) 07:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Removed your tag
We are not mind readers and this sort of tagging waists a lot of our time trying to suss-out what drive-by taggers are thinking. Please read: Responsible tagging--Aspro (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Not really drive-by exactly and also I did not patrol the page yet. At that time I think that the article should merge to Goat, and using pets as title looks a bit unencyclopedic (normally something like "Interaction" or "Roles"). Anyway thanks for the comment and sorry if there is any inconvenience. I've retouched the article. Feel free to revert it. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 13:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Attributing anonymous edits to a registered username
Hi NgYShung do you know if i can attribute the anonymous edits to my userid jibinmathews ? I had made all of them without signing in and well took notice when another wikipedian pointed this out :( According to Changing attribution for an edit i need to redirect. I think you can track my id and the username to the same location :) and i think the edits since 2014 attributed to this ip are mine. I have made more edits too from other computers but well i cannot track them down now. I believe we could raise tickets with the developer team till 2005 when it was closed off. 131.188.6.21 (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , Hello, thanks for noticing me. Before that, I hope that your main account (User:Jibinmathews) can confirm this to me here (sorry if this may bother you). If you are sure that your IP was static and not used by multiple users, I'll redirect it for you. Thanks!  NgYShung  huh? 12:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * What exactly are you going to do, NgYShung? And no, history cannot be modified to change the attribution of edits. --Neil N  talk to me 13:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi just adding a message from my registered id User talk:jibinmathews. According to the page Changing attribution for an edit i think we can redirect the user page and not the history. Earlier i believe the developers could directly change it in the database but now it will be separate pages. Like another wikipedian said, it will be better if i redirect so that the edits made with the ip can be enquired to with my id.Jibinmathews (talk) 13:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Jibinmathews, that practice was stopped in 2005. IP pages are not redirected to user pages. --Neil N  talk to me 15:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And I don't think the edits done in 2014 and 2015 with the IP above are yours? --Neil N  talk to me 15:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I know it was stopped. According to the project page, it says: "If you have a static IP that will not be reused by others, you may redirect your anonymous User: and User Talk: pages to your new account." But after seeing the contributions of the IP, per NeilN, I think the IP may be not static, and only have active contributions for a few days. I think you may check if your IP is dynamic or static here. Thanks,  NgYShung  huh? 06:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ITs ok guys. dont argue over this. its not a few days ,the edits made last year are definitely mine as those articles refer to my hometown and im now almost 10,000 km away from home since 2 years but the ones in 2014 i dont remember making those edits. :O. i will use my registered id from now on. was just too lazy to signin and was just easy to make edits and logout.signing in is a motivation to learn all this. Have a good day Jibinmathews (talk) 13:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

User Reported by Mistake
Hi NgYShung, I think you have by mistake reported a user with IP address - 110.92.125.107 on the Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism page. Most probably you were trying to report the user with IP address - 106.76.48.80. Could you please check? Happy Editing..!!
 * &#42;*SEW** (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I actually realized that after I report it. I've already remove it actually. Thanks for your notice. NgYShung  huh? 05:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi NgYShung. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANgYShung enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Make WikiProject Malaysia great again!
Lol, are you inspired by Trump? :D I just saw this WikiProject_Malaysia/Newsroom/Newsletter/September_2016! Nice work and thank you for reviving the project. I'm not from Malaysia, but I would love to help out once in a while! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * When I was writing this newsletter, I don't know why but "Make WikiProject Malaysia great again!" suddenly popped up in my head. Maybe I was influenced by Trump actually haha. Well, wish good luck working on this WikiProject! Cheers! NgYShung  huh? 14:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

re:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohit_Viswanath
Kindly visit: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2071648803060745/

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=2x-LAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA167&dq=%22rohit+viswanath%22+gilund&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUnoqcg_DOAhXCwI8KHVOJCZIQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q=%22rohit%20viswanath%22%20gilund&f=false -Pg 167 9.13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.206.118.28 (talk) 06:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Currently I'm busy. Will review after the session. Thanks for your patient! NgYShung  huh? 06:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I've reedited it. Cheers! NgYShung  huh? 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your Message
It is important that the New Beacon School reflects the facts. The controversy section should include a note of the victim's response to the letter or apology, in accordance with standard Press practice. I have amended the article accordingly.

The fact that Constantine was the Headmaster at the time of re-employing Woodward is clearly deducible from the referenced Press Statements, but the spokesperson was Mr Piercy who was employed after Constantine's mood. Omission of Constantine's name merely colludes with the misleading Press Statements, which were damaging to the victim, and for the which school apologised in writing. I would wish to avoid further incidents of misleading in favour of Mr Constantine's public relations at the expense of a victim of sexual abuse.

178.220.209.31 (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for commenting. But edits need to be written with reliable source so that it was confirmed and can be verified. You can review WP:CITE and WP:RELIABLE. Also "sex offender" may violates the neutral point of view. Happy editing! NgYShung  huh? 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

List of people with last name Adlam
Hi, I don't understand your edit summary on List of people with last name Adlam: "adlam" can also be referred to no name only. Can you explain more clearly why you reverted? Adlam does not list people with the last name Adlam; Adlam (name) does, which is why I retargetted it. Thanks, 210.6.254.106 (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the revert. Maybe some sudden blindness over there when reverting. I've reverted it back. And yet, sorry if there is any inconvenience, NgYShung  huh? 12:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

don't know where to send message about articles deletion
hi sir i don't know where to appeal for removal of deletion policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richarddev (talk • contribs) 05:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You can go to Articles for deletion/Rohit Chauhan and voice your opinion of the deletion of the article. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 05:15, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Too-speedy tagging
Thanks for patrolling new pages, a vital and under-appreciated task, but please don't tag newly created articles with WP:CSD or WP:CSD too soon after creation. While things like copyright violations and attack pages need to be tagged at once, new contributors often put in a word or two and then click "Save page" to see how it looks: it is discouraging and BITEy if a speedy-deletion template immediately pops up. For incomplete articles like Qaisar Abbas (which you tagged only one minute after creation), you should make a note of the title and wait at least 10 - 15 minutes before tagging. See uw-hasty. There is general advice about new page patrolling at WP:NPP, and about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Agree with User:JohnCD. See my earlier post: Removed your tag]. This editor seems far  too trigger-happy. He adds tags to new articles on  subjects he knows nothing about. Drive-by shooting Thus, adding more unnecessary debating  work for the  active creators. This slows down the expansion of any such new  articles. When I started editing WP, editors with reservations, disused it on the article's talk page first  but now lazy editors just add a tag with out explanation. --Aspro (talk) 10:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)


 * C'mon don't be so triggered man. Do you read my explanation on that? And also two of this scenario are different, one is just an small unaffected for the author merge to tag, and one is WP:A3. I don't always place these tags but only if it is blatant like unref and essay-like. "He adds tags to new articles on subjects he knows nothing about" does not really imply on merge to and the article I speedily tag on. Don't let just a merge to tag affect your editing. Thanks for noticing me about that. Cheers!  NgYShung  huh? 12:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, NgYShung, I think I'm going to have to put this in stronger terms. Do not do any more admin-like stuff. Find an article to write or improve, work in mainspace, then consider whether reviewing and administrative work is still of interest. If I hear any more complaints, I may have to block you for disruption. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  12:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh I see... Just a question, can I still do vandalism reverting? I'm still have interest on that, and yeah I'll stop for that kind of stuff. Thanks and regards, NgYShung  huh? 14:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are certain you are reverting actual vandalism (remember the incident where you reverted my work on a public library computer because I hadn't logged in to preserve security credentials). <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  15:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

PROD replacement
Greetings. I undid your re-placement of the proposed deletion template on Jeffrey Storey, because re-placement of a prod template is against the Proposed deletion policy. The proper course of action is to send the article to WP:AFD, if you feel it warrants it. -- 1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Hey NgYShung! Once a PROD is removed, it cannot be replaced back (regardless of whether it is a bad faith or good faith removal). Basically, a PROD is for uncontroversial deletions where not a single editor contests the PROD. Once removed, the next step is to send it to AfD. As you see, the article has now been sent to AfD by another editor. If you want you can debate it on the AfD now. Cheers! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Declined the G13
I declined the G13 nomination of Draft:StemEZ.com and Draft:User Nidadavolu. It did not yet been six months since the last edit.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think my finger was broken so I can't count good, just wanna take a note that the original user (Draft:User Nidadavolu) was blocked though. WP:MfD? NgYShung  huh? 14:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Userboxes
Dude Is there a way to check who has the most userboxes in Wikipedia? Check out my user page and you should know why I'm asking this... Such thing as a "userbox" competition? ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 09:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Not really. But it looks funny though. NgYShung  huh? 09:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * What looks funny? LOL... ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 09:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Funny there's too much userboxes. I think? NgYShung  huh? 09:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Rly?? LOL so whadaya think? Good? Took me 1hr++ ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 09:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC) (well you'd know everything about me)

Question about category
Is there any function or tools that can search or list the new articles in a specific category? Thanks for advance. NgYShung huh? 16:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * You can try Special:RecentChangesLinked. You'll need to choose the "Show page categorization" option. Of course you'll get all related changes, not just page creations (and figuring out which newly categorized pages are new may be tricky), but it does also show all pages that upon recent creation were added to the category. Huon (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your response! NgYShung  huh? 10:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

YGM
∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 16:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Sry I accidentally vandalised ur user pg
Sry, I didn't mean to press save :( I reverted it with twinkle already can u forgive me? ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 16:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Reply to your email: I did not know where the user lived and I did not state where the user live. I'm also not a WP:CU either. Regards, NgYShung  huh? 07:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Housekeeping
All the four links I just tagged: Moro attacks on Sabah, Moro attacks on Malaysia, Moro battles in Sabah and Moro conflict in Sabah for deletion to maintain the WP:NPOV as well to stick on the current issues. Sorry for accidentally tagging you on the csd as I am using an automatic tool. Molecule Extraction (talk) 08:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey . For deleting redirects with NPOV concerns, it is best to take it to WP:RFD. The speedy delete based on housekeeping is for un-controversial deletions. It is also important to clean up the incoming links first. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * OMG, I have choose a wrong way again, can you help me on this? To be honest, the way to deleting a number of past controversial article titles are much more frustrating than nominating template titles through tfd. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. I will have a look. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh damn. I just found a cut-paste move here. See, . This is troublesome. I will list it at histmerge and see if any admin can fix it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I added a histmerge request here. Let's see how it goes. Once it is done, we can try nominating those for deletion. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Introductions
Hi!. You are officially invited to WikiProject Introductions! WikiProject Introductions aims to bring the lead sections of Wikipedia's articles up to the standards of the lead section guidelines. This is generally "Cleanup" of the lead section (introduction) of an article. Leave a message on my talk page for help. Cheers, ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 09:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
 Jim Car  ter  17:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Malaysia October 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line  to your. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Mass message sender granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:
 * Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
 * For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
 * The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.
 * (Personal note) Always be careful with the formatting of the list you put in the tool.

For information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

RfC for page patroller qualifications
Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying (or inviting) me. :) NgYShung  huh? 14:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

10,000 Asia Challenge
Hi, I wondered if you would be interested in joining WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge based on The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge? The idea is to showcase the work being done on wikipedia across the continent, and inspire more people to create and work on countries which might not usually get much attention and then possibly running some contests to bring in new editors. I know it's very existence will definitely make me more likely to contribute more on Malaysia and other countries. Could be a way to highlight work needing doing for Malaysia and draw in new editors! Or start a 1000 Challenge for Malaysia feeding into it or something? Not sure, but if interested add your name to the participants and I'll consider setting something up later in the month.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violation for Chung Ling High School Wikipedia page
Hi,

I'm not sure why is Chung Ling High School being filed for copyright issue. The blogspot that contains 88% of same phrases as the Wikipedia page isn't copyrighted and hasn't been active since 2006. Can you please remove the copyright filing from the page?

Thanks.

Jeffrey ooi (talk) 08:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Jeffrey ooi
 * I already knew there would be concern about this. After some thinking, I've cleaned the article so there is no leftover copyvio infringement. But the article still may be deleted. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 09:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Major-Exams
Template:Major-Exams has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Southern Christian College — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mai;iro (talk • contribs) 06:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Response to merge
Hey I'm on my phone right now, for some reason it won't let me edit the section you made, so I'm responding here. Tanks and land vehicles aren't neccisarily synonymous, for instance we (as coordinator for both MILHIST and tanks, I'm clarifying that we is going to be used to mean wiki project tanks) don't include half tracks, motorcycles, tractors, trucks, a lot of specialized equipment, etc etc. Tanks is more specialized, and an informal (likely will be formal once we gain more members) child project of MILHIST, it would be inappropriate to merge them. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  15:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments, hope you get back to your computer soon! Please also remove my note at the comment section after responding to the discussion. NgYShung  huh? 16:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

anti-capitalist
I wasn't putting in "original research" - the citation I corrected was "original research" in your definition. And correcting the word to "anti-capitalist" remedied the distraction and contradiction that the former "original research" had with the preceding paragraph that spoke of "socialist economists". Marxism and socialism are not the same thing! Please undo that - if you undid my edit that is biased hogwash bullcrap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.145.175.95 (talk) 23:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-44
<section begin="technews-2016-W44"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes
 * Now you can include Commons video films with subtitles in your wiki language. Before you could see translated videos on file page at Commons only.
 * Search now has an updated preference tab to configure the search completion suggester.
 * The visual editor is now available on all wikis using only one language script.

Changes this week
 * Octicons-sync.svg The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 1st. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 2nd. It will be on all wikis from November 3rd (calendar).
 * Now you can use autocomplete for page names in "" field when editing templates.
 * Special:NewPages can now be filtered by page size.

Future changes
 * Octicons-tools.svg New MediaWiki deployments will be now based on MediaWiki 1.29.

Miscellaneous
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Technical Collaboration Guideline is available for community review. Any feedback welcome, in any language.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2016-W44"/> 16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!
Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event: Best Wishes, Addis Wang Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
 * 2) Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
 * 3) Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
 * 4) If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
 * 5) If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Tech News: 2016-45
<section begin="technews-2016-W45"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes
 * Victoria Coleman is the new Chief technology officer for the Wikimedia Foundation.
 * First release candidate for MediaWiki 1.28 is now available.
 * Octicons-tools.svg for MediaWiki branches and extensions switched from targeting a specific branch to using.
 * Section numbers in Table of Contents boxes will use grey to improve readability.

Changes this week
 * The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey begins on 7 November.
 * Octicons-sync.svg The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 8th. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 9th. It will be on all wikis from November 10th (calendar).
 * Special:ActiveUsers will allow users groups selection.

Meetings
 * Octicons-sync.svg You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 8 November 2016 at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
 * Octicons-tools.svg You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topics this week are Image Thumbnail API and allow SVG files uploaded on MediaWiki to have XHTML namespaces. The meeting will be on 9 November at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes
 * RevisionSlider will be enabled by default on all beta wikis, on testwiki, testwiki2, mediawikiwiki and de.wikipedia.org.
 * Upcoming holidays will impact deployments. The schedule has been published.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2016-W45"/> 23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-46
<section begin="technews-2016-W46"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes
 * When you edit with the visual editor you can use  +   +   to add a reference. The meta key is often the control key or command key.

Changes this week
 * Octicons-sync.svg The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 15. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 16. It will be on all wikis from November 17 (calendar).
 * In Special:Preferences you can choose which language menus and buttons will be in. If there is no translation for that language, MediaWiki has a list of fallback languages. A fallback language is a language many will understand better than English. MediaWiki will now use English when there is no Ukrainian translation.

Meetings
 * Octicons-sync.svg You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 15 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes
 * Magic links might not work in the future.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2016-W46"/> 19:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1
Hi,

The Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1 (the 3rd Wikipedia meetups in Malaysia) will be held on:
 * Date: Sunday, 11 December 2016
 * Time: 12:00-2:00 pm
 * Venue: Sudo Brew, 7 Jalan SS 22/11, Damansara Jaya, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
 * Medium of communication:
 * English language - for the general overall meetup
 * Malay language - for a special session to discuss ms.wikipedia.org (subject to enough number of participants)

For more details, please check the meetup page at Meetup/Selangor 1 Chongkian (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Just wanna leave a small note that since I'm not living at (or living pretty far away from) Selangor and a lot of school work was hitting on me, I will not be present there. Good luck holding the meetup! (P/S: I may also help sending MMS for the meetup later)  NgYShung  huh? 16:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yo, thanks for the respond. It's ok, Wikipedia Malaysia user group are still very new & small. That's why I'm trying to keep introducing this at the very beginning stage. We've made the Johor meetup, KL meetup, now Selangor meetup. Next is probably Malacca or Penang meetup. I'm trying to reach all states first if possible, lol. I know it's not easy & takes a lot of time & continuous efforts. But at least someone has to do it. Maybe you can also do a meetup at your home state, and I'll see if I'm available to come or not ;) Chongkian (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC
Hi. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1
The 3rd Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup had now arrived on Selangor! Pack your bags and your laptop, and meet some fellow Malaysia Wikipedians in the meetup!
 * Date: Sunday, 11 December 2016
 * Time: 12:00 - 2:00 pm
 * Venue: Sudo Brew, 7 Jalan SS 22/11, Damansara Jaya, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3.13169°N, 101.62122°W)
 * Medium of communication:
 * English language - for the general overall meetup
 * Malay language - for a special session to discuss ms.wikipedia.org (subject to enough number of participants)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page or at the Facebook event page. (Delivered: 07:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC))

Your GA nomination of Lee Chong Wei
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lee Chong Wei you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lee Chong Wei
The article Lee Chong Wei you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lee Chong Wei for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lee Chong Wei
The article Lee Chong Wei you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lee Chong Wei for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

RfC non-admin closer
NgYShung, I'm very surprised that you proposed yourself as a non-admin closer for this important RFC. Can you explain a bit how you came to know about it and deciding to do so? Wrigleygum (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It's quite the same as determine the consensus of the discussion thus closing it. See WP:NAC and Consensus. NgYShung  huh? 06:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * My question was rather specific, if you don't mind. How did you came to know about the Singapore RFC and deciding to offer yourself experience-wise? - as it appears to be your first attempt at RFC closing and a substantial one at that. Wrigleygum (talk) 08:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The bar for "substantial" is unfathomably low if the RfC in question is considered to meet that threshold. That said, Wrigleygum you are welcome to challenge RfC closes if you feel the close was performed incorrectly, but asking what appear to be leading questions is not the way to do it. If you feel there is an issue, say what that is rather than running circles around it, and if you feel NgYShung has not addressed this issue with their responses, the procedures for moving ahead are detailed at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. CMD (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Let him answer. Wrigleygum (talk) 20:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * NgYShung, before we discuss the RFC specifics as per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, can I know how you came to know about the Singapore RFC in the first place and to offer yourself as Closer? Wrigleygum (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , we are all here to improve the encyclopaedia. If you have any problems with the RFC, please look at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and follow the steps over there. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing challenge process first steps - "..contact the editor who performed the closure and try to resolve the issue through discussion"". If this procedure is ambiguous to yourself an 'experienced' editor, you can press to change of the guidelines. Wrigleygum (talk) 10:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , the thing is, you haven't stated any particular "issue" with the close. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I am writing on his talk page and not accusing you of any involvement, but the more you reply here, the issue becomes suspect. Any interactions between us should be on our respective talk pages for now. So please to not obscure my questions nor provide any leading opinions here. If the closer is confident enough to close an RFC, he should be able to justify the reasons without 'prompts/answers'. (Copying parts to Lemongirl talk page). Wrigleygum (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what "not accusing you of any involvement" and stuff you are trying to say here. Please go ahead and state it clearly. I am perfectly free to reply here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Any replies later will be on your talk page. Night out, will be back late. Wrigleygum (talk) 11:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * - NgYShung, can I know how you came to know about the Singapore RFC in the first place and to offer yourself as Closer?
 * - To save time, I'm adding the next question. You said -  "..public opinions are mostly wide-based and cannot be decide truly". Please expand your answers, it is puzzling. Wrigleygum (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This is really not a great time after my 5 days wikibreak right now. Just so you know I saw this RfC because I was browsing WP:ANI and saw a discussion thread about Singapore WP:NPOV and start looking at it. Then I reviewed the proposal, comments and statements and saw that the WP:Consensus is quite clear. That's why I decided to close the RfC. For the "public opinions" one, because the "Gallup polls" doesn't include comments of people who are supporting or opposing (which we cannot verify if the polls are really true of not). And that's looks like not a good thing to adapt with Wikipedia per WP:VOTE. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 03:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your answer still makes no sense as does your earlier grammar. Do you have experience or understand the mechanism/methodology of polling by established pollsters like Gallup? "not a good thing to adapt with Wikipedia per WP:VOTE" - What are you trying to say here and what has wikiedia vote got to do with it? Wrigleygum (talk) 04:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agreed that my English grammar is not quite as good since English is not my babel. Even the gallup polls are true, but the problem is the article is "opinionated" and biased which is not a reliable source in Wikipedia, see WP:BIASED. NgYShung  huh? 05:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You seem to be avoiding the questions. Please answer them. Wrigleygum (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Let me warp this up: I said "not a good thing to adapt with Wikipedia per WP:VOTE" because I wanted to state that it is much more opinionated and you can't comment anything about why you support or opposed in the polls, just not like the system in Wikipedia. Even the article itself was biased, even though the polls may be true. If you think this is a reliable source, please state how do you know Gallup poll is polled by "established pollsters" and the mechanism of it, also providing a reliable source with it. Saying "Do you have experience or understand the mechanism/methodology of polling by established pollsters like Gallup?" won't help at all. NgYShung  huh? 06:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Gallup is sanctioned/engaged by OECD to conduct the polls, what makes you think you would be qualified to judge the methodology of established pollsters and international organisations like OECD? Afaik, Gallup employs the same methodology in all countries in world it polls, translated to the relevant language if it is not english. Wrigleygum (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "also providing a reliable source with it" - Please read all the statement before answering. Thank you. NgYShung  huh? 06:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I've partly answered that in the RFC and we can debate more, but will appreciated you address the immediate questions I asked. Are the questions unclear? Wrigleygum (talk) 06:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * What questions which you mean? NgYShung  huh? 06:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I asked - "Gallup is sanctioned/engaged by OECD to conduct the polls, what makes you think you would be qualified to judge the methodology of established pollsters and international organisations like OECD?"
 * As to: "much more opinionated and you can't comment anything about why you support or opposed in the polls", That's the related question whether you have an understanding/experience in such polling research?. You are looking for discussions, not polls. Wrigleygum (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding related questions to save time -
 * Have you read through all the references I have provided in the RFC?
 * Did you set aside the one-liner votes with little or no elaboration? -Wrigleygum (talk) 07:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

RfC non-admin closer 2
, questions continued from above before the interruption:
 * your statement "..it is much more opinionated and you can't comment anything about why you support or opposed in the polls". I will have to guess roughly what you are talking about… are you suggesting more discussions rather than standardised polling?
 * OECD has sanctioned/engaged Gallup to conduct the polls. Are you questioning the survey methodology of OECD and Gallup? -Wrigleygum (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Lee Chong Wei
 Schwede 66  00:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your promotion to Lee Chong Wei article. I've been update for years since and now is paid off, and appreciate your copy-editing and cleanup to the article too! --Aleen f 1  13:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No thanks, let's keep on working on it!  NgYShung  huh? 07:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Mamasanju (talk) 04:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy Lunar New Year!
Thank you for all your help with reviving WP:MY. I am happy that the project is now more active than before!. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit (personal life)
Hello I tried to discuss with Vickymehta03 about an edit, but his page directed me here. Are you Vickymehta03? If not I am sorry. I have started a topic at talk of Madhuri Dixit's page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Madhuri_Dixit

Any help regarding this will be much appreciated.

Thanks Analyst2017 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Analyst2017
 * Hi there, I'm not Vickymehta03, their user talk page is User talk:Vickymehta03. Cheers! NgYShung  huh? 08:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, surprisingly, when I press "my talk page" on his page it directs me to your page. Analyst2017 (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Analyst2017

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 2
Hi NgYShung,

Mind to help promote & invite users to the Meetup/Selangor 2 for this coming Saturday (25 February 2017)?

And please feel free to join this meetup. Thanks a LOT ;)

Chongkian (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll be doing an invitation template like last time soon, good luck!  NgYShung  huh? 10:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Yo, thanks a lot man! ~ :D .. Oh ya, can you update the detailed venue (Conference Room, Level 18) and time (11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.) ? Thanks :) Chongkian (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 2
The 4th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Selangor, and you are invited!
 * Date: Saturday, 25 February 2017
 * Time: 11:00 am - 1:00 pm (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
 * Venue: Menara Sunway  (check page for venue/room update) , Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3.069°N, 101.61017°W)
 * Medium of communication:
 * English language - for the general overall meetup
 * Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

→ To collaborate between Wikipedia Malaysia User Group and Sunway Group, a large corporation in Malaysia. → To create Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects)'s articles and edit/improve articles on the spot.

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 11:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC))

Wikipedia Johor Meetup 2
Hi NgYShung,

The normal things as usual ;) --> Meetup/Johor 2 on 18 March 2017.

By the way, regarding the Wikipedia Meetup page in ms.wikipedia.org, can you create the main page which tallies with the en.wikipedia.org (Meetup/Malaysia) meetup page version? My Malay language is not that good, especially for official writing purpose, hehe .. Once we have a nice page with standardized template, I can add by myself any future meetup or event. Maybe can liaise with that Yosri user. Thanks yo!

At least this first few years (starting early 2015), I will try to make many meetups around Malaysia to get enough Wikipedia Malaysia users & editors to make sure the ball keeps rolling (frankly speaking, I can't be the only one who keep this thing running, lol). In April next month I will go to Ipoh, and probably will make the Wikipedia Perak Meetup 1 ;)

Chongkian (talk) 04:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Just wondering, would it be possible to let some editors join online? For me, travelling/physical meetup is a bit of a problem. But if we have a synced google docs, I would be happy to join in and contribute. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Uhm, all of our meetup so far are being done offline (that's what a meetup is about right?). For any online discussion, the main page for it for Malaysia Wikipedia is Meetup/Malaysia. Or from there, you can also browse for each of the meetup page which was done before (e.g. Meetup/Selangor 2), where I've written each minutes of meeting from the meetup. Of course from there we need to make follow up accordingly (I try to make it continuously so that we dont keep reinventing the wheel - or keep discussing the same thing again & again). We also have our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/groups/ms.wiki/), although less official discussions are being discussed there. This Johor Meetup 2 is also for me to understand the upcoming Wikimedia Conference 2017 in Berlin in which I will join end of this month. Following to your suggestion, I think I can setup a gmail account with its google docs for Wikipedia Malaysia ;) Traveling is a bit of a problem? I dont think so, cuz so many Singaporeans go to Johor every weekend for shopping :P Chongkian (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to the Wikipedia Johor Meetup 2
The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time in Johor. Since it is at holiday, check it out if you have time!
 * Date: Saturday, 18 March 2017
 * Time: 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
 * Venue: Al-Haji Grand Restaurant, Jalan Austin Heights 8/2, Taman Mount Austin, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia (1.562°N, 103.77628°W)
 * Medium of communication:
 * English language - for the general overall meetup
 * Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquirers, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC))