User talk:Renamed user JsXy4fdNYGALz7

June 2024
Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Sad but True even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the [ page history] for now. Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 00:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey, um FlightTime, it's SuperLuigi83 again, upon rereading over the page's current talk section, it seems a consensus was in fact reached on the song being groove metal under the category known as "thrash metal?" I thought about starting my own talk section for this topic but it seems with it already being seemingly brought to a conclusion on, it seems its appropriate to label the song as groove metal. This combined with my source provided seem to make this fact hard to argue against. Again though, I'll give you a chance to argue your case. Look over my source if you wish, and if you believe it to be faulty, I'll rest my case, but if you fail to come up with a valid argument, it seems only appropriate that I reinstate my change. I won't do it right away, but if a strong argument against the genre's addition is unable to be reached, groove metal will be readded as a genre. Thank you again. I know we're both trying to make Wikipedia a better place in the end. SuperLuigi83 (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)