User talk:Renamed user OCfxJKu7j2/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Italay90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Theodora (Civ5), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Theodora (Civ5)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Countries
You might want to read the notes at the top of the various articles about the use of country. If nothing else they should tell you that the changes you just made (and which I reversed) are controversial and should be discussed if you think they should be made. Your previous contribution to one discussion here indicates that you are aware of the controversies so making the changes without agreement could be considered disruptive  Snowded  TALK 02:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes you are correct, I got in contact with the wikipedia information team prior to this who agreed with me that the article should be edited.

"Although we appreciate your interest in our project, I apologize that the email response team can not make changes on request for all articles. Unfortunately, the limited number of volunteers involved cannot keep up with such requests due to the very large number of emails we receive daily. However, I invite you to make the changes you suggested yourself. Wikipedia is a 'wiki', which means that everyone can edit pages."''


 * However, I probably took this for granted (which I regret). Sorry for not responding to your concerns sooner, thank you so much,

Italay90 (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
See Country.

Lectonar (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

&#160; See Sovereign State. Italay90 (talk) 09:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Hong Kong unification movement with the United Kingdom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Kong unification movement with the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hong Kong unification movement with the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 09:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong unification movement with the United Kingdom


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hong Kong unification movement with the United Kingdom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STSC (talk) 03:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independence referendum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Scottish independence poll, May 2014
The poll you have linked does not mention Scottish independence.


 * 1) Q1 is UK voting intention (next general election)
 * 2) Q2 approval of UK Government
 * 3) Q3 approval of David Cameron
 * 4) Q4 approval of Ed Miliband
 * 5) Q5 approval of Nick Clegg
 * 6) Q6 is the coalition working well
 * 7) Q7 is the coalition good or bad
 * 8) Q8 is the economy being managed well
 * 9) Q9 state of the economy
 * 10) Q10 how will your finances change

Then there is a series of questions about Ed Miliband's leadership. This is followed by a series of questions about AstraZeneca and Pfizer, then questions about a series of other issues (assisted suicide, Afghanistan, halal meat. There is nothing about Scotland or Scottish independence in that poll. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The references given are insufficient and are arguably misleading because they do not refer to the previous result obtained by this firm (which showed a much bigger majority for no). If you look at the other public opinion polls listed, links to the raw polling data are given. I suspect that this firm do not release their data because it is not a member of the British Polling Council, which sets standards in the field and requires that members disclose their findings. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Further to the above, I think we could include it, but we would have to make it clear that a) the firm is not a BPC member and b) the firm asked the question "Do you believe Scotland should become an independent country", rather than the actual question "Should Scotland be an independent country’". Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Derry. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  11:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Overseas Territories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Your recent editing history at England shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 15:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White Bermudian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European people. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted your edits
Hello. I'm leaving this message on your talk page because of your changes to Derry. Recently, you changed the start of the article to 'Londonderry', citing that a consensus was reached with 4 supports to 3 opposes. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's a majority of 1 Wikipedian. There is no consensus for this. A consensus for this would have an overwhelming majority. st170etalk 20:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catalan self-determination referendum, 2014, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Noguera and Garrigues. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unionism in Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Scott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irvine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

RFC@Derry
Hi Italay90, I've attempted a re-write of your RFC at WP:Derry. Are you happy with its objectives?Dubs boy (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Edits to Talk:Derry
I'm guessing that this and this were added by you when you were logged out. If so, you might like to go back and add your signature. Regards, Scolaire (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Or maybe not. The RfC has now been closed with a "Please do not modify it" header. Scolaire (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)