User talk:Renamed user awfwvowjvwrvnwio/Archive 2

A page you started (NFA to DFA conversion) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating NFA to DFA conversion, Luis150902!

Wikipedia editor Mz7 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I have restored the unreferenced tag and added an incomplete tag, explaining my reasons at Talk:NFA to DFA conversion. This is a good starting point, but it doesn't expand what is already available at Powerset construction."

To reply, leave a comment on Mz7's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blacklisted links
If you need to get an exception for a blacklisted link, please use MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Creating your own redirects or inserting characters to circumvent the blacklist is likely to result in actions against this account. Kuru  (talk)  00:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Counterfeit Viagra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Counterfeit Viagra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Counterfeit Viagra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

User talk:TBoz2011
Hello Luis150902. I'm sure you did not intend it, but your actions related to this new user come across as WP:BITE-y. Would you be willing to revert your message there? Thanks, Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. I've reverted it, then nominated for Articles for deletion and then kept. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 10:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

William Oxley
Hi there. Your edit to William Oxley, removing the copyvio and rewriting, was a great idea. Will you work on it more to make sure it meets our policy for living persons (WP:BLP)? As it stands now, the article might be deleted very soon despite your work. Also, I took the liberty of informing the user who created the article about their mistake. Make sure you do so in future as well if you notice the original tagger forgetting to do so. Regards  So Why  15:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Corin Braga
Hi, this article was not suitable to be moved into the mainspace - could you please take the time to improve it or move it back to a draft? -- samtar talk or stalk 14:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Akshay Bardapurkar (Politician)
Hi, you removed a speedy deletion tag from this article - the article is of course not created by the user account Amitabh12, as that user has been blocked for some months, but the creator is clearly a sockpuppet of that user, as the article is very similar to previous versions (there have been several blocked socks involved, who have recreated it a few times) and there are some specific idiosyncratic features. See Sockpuppet investigations/Amitbhb12 for more info on this. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Marc Abrams
Hi there, I'm sorry, I shouldn't have reverted your removal of the CSD tag. I have reverted my revert. As an explanation for the G11, however, the Draft suffers strongly from undue weight. There is a vast quantity of reliable sources that discuss the lawsuit Abrams and his brother were involved in, and almost no reliable sources about the article subject to support any of the other content in the article. As such, it is promotional of the subject. That said, however, your removal of the CSD was your prerogative and I do apologize for reverting it. Thank you for your time! Waggie (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
According to G11, changing it to neutral language is preferable to deletion, so how are you being fair? You seem like a cranky angry person. And why not delete those other posts about all the other trade shows and brands then?GoldLakeExihibitonCorporation (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll undo the speedy deletion. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 22:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-fee rationale?
I got a message from you saying that File:Visual C++ Icon.png does not have a non-free usage rationale. But it does. I'm confused.  Arjun G. Menon  ( talk  · mail) 22:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The logo consists only of simple geometric shapes and is in the public domain. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 06:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CommieGNULinux.svg
Thanks for uploading File:CommieGNULinux.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pregnancy in art (January 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pregnancy in art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Claudio (cantante)
Hello Luis150902. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Claudio (cantante), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: R3 does not apply to redirects created by a page move where the original page was not recently created, consider WP:RfD or wait for the WP:AfD of the main article to complete. Thank you. A le_Jrb talk 08:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

46 DC EA D3 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 46 DC EA D3. Since you had some involvement with the 46 DC EA D3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Primefac (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Excessive citations listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Excessive citations. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Excessive citations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Primefac (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Archived discussions
Regarding your explanation that the link doesn't work. That always happens after the discussion is archived. Is there a special reason you decided to mention it on this user's talkpage? Debresser (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * For the purpose of reference and avoiding complications when looking for the discussion. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 16:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Removing speedy tags
Hi, I have noticed several instances where you have removed speedy tags erroneously, including most recently a  from a reviewer on a draft which was a copyright violation. You also said that it wasn't a copyvio, but it very much was. This is not the first instance, so I'd ask that you please stop evaluating speedy deletion tags until you understand the criteria. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Closing AfDs
- Hi, I am wondering why you have closed Articles for deletion/Opang Jamir as having a consensus after one day? The article likely meets several deletion criteria but AfDs do not work this way. Secondly, you have been asked by many editors to stop messing with/assessing speedy deletions and various other deletions, yet on this same article, Opang Jamir you not only closed the AfD after a single day, but then tagged it for deletion as G4 immediately after your erroneous WP:SNOW close. This is not how G4 works - G4 is for articles that have been recreated AFTER deletion by AfD. I am going to ask you, one editor from another, please stop overstepping into pseudo-admin territory as you seem to be doing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)