User talk:Renamed user dfghtjd64/Archive6

A3071 Road
Hi. You used Roader's Digest - The SABRE Wiki as a reference for this article. Unfortunately, my understanding is that this doesn't qualify as a reliable source because anyone can edit that article at any time, and it may contain mistakes. The Historic OS Maps on SABRE Maps, however, I believe can be used a source because it's ultimately a map produced by a Government department, and you can use the wiki as a "See Also" page under links. Hope that clears things up a bit. -- Ritchie333  (talk)  17:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

-

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited A1152 road, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Woodbridge and Melton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

About vandal editing on a page "Caucasian Avars"
Dear-admins and other! I ask to pay your attention to that fact, that before my arrival to Wikipedia.eng, your article "Caucasian Avars" was in a pity condition. There was no neither illustrations, nor a normal text. It occured only because from were constantly done the editing, called to not help at all to improve, and on the contrary to destroy. The same process now has begun.About all this I have specified on a page "conversations". Familiarize with it, please. Editing of the user Tigril34 is in practice vandal  pseudohistorical editing. It deliberately prevents to work. Notice, that it tries to bring by any in clause a mention Turks. And it is more than anything does not do. And without any preliminary discussion!--Gorgan Aparshahr (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Cambridge
Hi. In connection with this merge (and with reference to #WikiProject Cambridge Members) it might be worth considering proposing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject East Anglia to amend WikiProject East Anglia to include Cambridge-importance=|Cambridge=. -- Trevj (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

IM5
I have removed the speedy deletion tag on IM5. A band formed by Simon Fuller, Perez Hilton and Jamie King is notable if only for their involvement behind the scenes, if not for the band's own accomplishments. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. When you recently edited Thetford, Cambridgeshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ely (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Carlo T. Piranio
I removed your CSD and your PROD-BLP on the article. The person isn't living so it isn't a BLP and the article makes a claim of significance. I'm going to do a little bit of research and I may slap it with a notability page. Otherwise, wait a day or so and then take it to AFD. Ryan Vesey Review me!  18:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of bus routes in Stowmarket & Needham Market for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bus routes in Stowmarket & Needham Market is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Stowmarket & Needham Market (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Wilbysuffolk   Talk to me  16:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Ignore this as i'm trying to delete it myself!!

Nomination of List of bus routes in Ely for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bus routes in Ely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Ely (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Wilbysuffolk   Talk to me  17:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Ignore this as i'm trying to delete it myself!!

Proposed deletion of Julian Roughton


The article Julian Roughton has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't appear to be notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  10:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Julian Roughton


A tag has been placed on Julian Roughton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – hysteria18 (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Julian Roughton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julian Roughton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julian Roughton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – hysteria18 (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)