User talk:Renamed user ejiwheismwkwiwkqlroi21

January 2021
Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Libertarian Party (United States), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Example...
...of what, exactly? Lone Internaut (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * What edit did that editor made that was disruptive? Also, I noticed you are in a edit war with that editor. Darubrub (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The most recent is the arbitrary substitution of terminologies - which probably he doesn't appreciate, he tried on other articles to do the same, without success - and the removal of sourced text that he claims is "biased", without any kind of multi-user analysis, discussion or consent on if the source is or not actually biased. His talk page has other issues reported in the past days, although most of his vandalism are being rollbacked by now.


 * I suggest you to tell him to stop, since he is causing the problem. Anyway I will go to the Project talk if he continues. Lone Internaut (talk) 15:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok I get your point, I warned him of his vulgar language. Darubrub (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I already reported him. Hope they will get the thing done. Users like these should have no place on Wikipedia. Lone Internaut (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It's nothing but please do not modify my text (or other users' text) in talks: I write it as I intend it to be - if I write Wiki, just leave Wiki. Lone Internaut (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok! Darubrub (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsenal (Roblox) (February 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arsenal (Roblox) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arsenal (Roblox), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arsenal_(Roblox) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderWaterford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arsenal_(Roblox) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lua (programming language), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:AlgoExpert


A tag has been placed on Draft:AlgoExpert, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. EN - Jungwon  15:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Yes it is two. That account and another called RedbloomsLLC. Wdym 3? Are you referring to my main or my ip address? Darubrub (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, is three, not two. If you've also been using your IP address, that's also a concern. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok you're referring to my main. No if you check my IP adress, there are no contributions from that IP. Darubrub (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For any future unblock request, Darubrub's claim appears correct. As of now, I see no evidence of editing from IP addresses by this user while signed out. --Yamla (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Unblock 2

 * I have listed my contribution wishes in the final UBR. Darubrub (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)



Unblock 3
You indicate that you are retired, or plan to retire once unblocked. Is that accurate? If so, there's no reason to lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I want to change my username to say "Retired" and also put the retired template on my user page. Darubrub (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * In that case, there's no reason to unblock you, nor should we unblock you. If you withdraw your open unblock request, I can put the retired template on your user page. Note that you are not permitted to set up any other account or otherwise continue editing. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Darubrub (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. You are welcome to change your mind in the future, particularly if you decide to follow WP:SO. You are welcome (but not obligated) to remove any content you wish from this page apart from the declined unblock requests. That means you are also welcome to remove this comment from me (or indeed, the entire section). --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Final Unblock
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Edits to Lua
As it turns out, this editor made two edits to the Lua page which broke the object example.

If editing code examples, it’s good form to test the examples to make sure one’s edits do not break the example code in the article.

The first edit broke the code because it now refers to a non-existent table. The second edit broke the code because it changed the arguments list given to vector.new without changing the arguments given to the function when called as vector:new.

Point being, it’s really sloppy to edit Wikipedia articles to break code examples. I have since fixed the examples, and expanded the section.

Since the editor has now been blocked, it’s all moot.

(We probably should have a discussion about what belongs in the Wikipedia and what belongs in Wikibooks, but that’s another discussion for another day).

Samboy (talk) 06:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dgraph (July 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dgraph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dgraph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dgraph Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dgraph reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:AlgoExpert
Hello, Darubrub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AlgoExpert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 47220
is now open. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * They've been doing good work on SIMPLEWIKI and CU found no evasion. Would like to unblock -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 14:39, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Too busy IRL to look at this in detail, so I'll leave it to another admin. If anyone feels it should be an unblock then I won't object. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 20:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * After reviewing this user's contributions and standing on Simple Wiki, I support an unblock. I'll leave to user:NinjaRobotPirate as original blocking admin to have the final decision. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 22:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, I have no idea what the unblock request says. if the unblock request is that reasonable, why not restore talk page access so it can be posted on-wiki? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Restored TPA.
 * SIMPLE:Special:Contributions/Darubrub
 * xtools summary -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Endorse unblock based on SIMPLEWIKI constructive edits. Please see links above--  8,000 edits, rollbacker. No concerns noted on talk page. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 15:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Just in case anyone wonders about those two accounts that edited my talk page. simple:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 61. Darubrub (Inform me) 19:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Darubrub, your unblock request seems to be saying that you have trouble tying your own shoelaces and need to be told "vandalism is bad" before you understand this concept – even after you report other people for doing the same exact thing. But if someone really wants to unblock, go ahead. Given your inability to tell whether vandalism is acceptable or not, I think you may want to get a mentor to help you learn other basic policies on English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * With all the considerable respect you are due, I think this user has shown that they did learn and grow, and while the block was needed to bring them to the point of being able to edit constructively, they have shown they are able to do so. They have moved beyond the past for which they are blocked. Let us celebrate that rare success of being able to unblock and welcome a user back. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It's OK, you can call me an asshole. I can take it.  I'm just tired of being the internet's babysitter.  Darubrub, I'm sorry for insinuating that you're an idiot.  If you have a thick skin, you can come to me if you need assistance from an administrator.  You might never like me, but I can get things done. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome back. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 02:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)