User talk:Renamed user g5s6n3yi8z7g08cs/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hi NmWTfs85lXusaybq! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing!

Extended-confirmed restrictions
Hi ,

I have noticed that you have recently edited pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Please note that, due to community consensus documented at WP:GS/RUSUKR, only extended-confirmed editors may make such edits.

When in doubt, please assume that a topic is covered by this restriction. We call this "broadly construed". If this still leaves you unsure about whether a topic is affected by the restriction, feel free to ask on my talk page.

This is not widely announced to newcomers, so I'm not blaming or condemning you for not knowing about this. I'm also not saying that your editing has been problematic in any other way. Your edit may well have been perfectly fine in all other regards, yet may have been removed for this reason.

Additionally, Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee has recognized "Eastern Europe or the Balkans" as a generally contentious topic area. Don't worry: The restriction to extended-confirmed editors is about the Russo-Ukrainian War, not the entirety of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. The box below contains standardized advice for everyone.

Introduction to contentious topics
This may be confusing, so I'll attempt to summarize it:
 * Only extended-confirmed editors may edit pages related to the Russo-Ukrainian War. Details and exceptions can be found at WP:GS/RUSUKR.
 * All edits about Eastern Europe and the Balkans, by all users, need to be done with extra care.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Connection to Uwdwadafsainainawinfi?
Hi, do you have a connection to Uwdwadafsainainawinfi? The usernames seem similar, and you both have recently edited the page Separate Presidential Brigade.

If you are the same person, please disclose this on your user page to avoid impressions of sockpuppetry.

Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * No. I have no connection to Uwdwadafsainainawinfi. I edited Separate Presidential Brigade because it had been listed in the CS1 errors: dates category.
 * All the best. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, now I understand. Sorry,, this is of course not sockpuppetry. Thanks for the clarification and all the best, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

"twk"
Hi you used the edit summary "twk" here -- I assume "twk" means "tweak"? Deletion of a holiday is more than a "tweak", which one assumes is a minor change. What's the thinking behind this holiday deletion? -- Green  C  14:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It's obviously an incorrect calculation. Dongzhi Festival is also based on solar terms, just like Qingming Festival whose datasource of calendar date was removed here. It's on the winter solstice. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Some of the calculators on wiki are not working right. Do you know a source online for future dates? We can make a static file containing a list of the dates. -- Green  C  18:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I currently focus on Chinese calendar only. Chinese traditional festivals on wiki as well as calculation of their calendar dates could be found here. I only use www.timeanddate.com as a third party reference for verification. I have fixed some of bugs in Ctime:L here and in Ctime:00 here related to some incorrect calculations before. Please remind me if you find more calculators' failure and I will try to fix them. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * There is a problem with the Chinese New Year see Talk:Chinese_New_Year about ctime:x it might effect others also. -- Green  C  18:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The problem you mentioned there should be resolved by one of bug fixes I provided, as I said. I'm sure you will realize how these bugs result in your problem after you read my bug fixes. Feel free to check them and remind me if your problem still exists. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 19:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That's amazing. We've been trying to find and fix this for a very long time. I notified User:M.boli who has been the main person trying to find a solution. -- Green  C  21:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I checked wikidata of Ctime:L and Ctime:00. These bugs still exist in these templates on other wikis. I think you can help me update them to apply my bug fixes as you did to NUMBEROF. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks like Ctime:L is in 3 wikis and Ctime:00 in 4 .. seems low. Is it accurate? -- Green  C  04:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Guess so. The original author Orienomesh-w, who appears to be inactive, didn't introduce this template series to other wikis, which was done by local user there instead. Luckily, these imported templates are not widely used, according to What links here shows there. Therefore it's not necessary to apply bug fixes at present. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 06:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I updated those 7. -- Green  C  13:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I finished the remaining work after I found you have updated only 6 of them except แม่แบบ:Ctime:00. Thanks anyway. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for verifying. -- Green  C  14:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * THANK YOU! I had spent some effort looking at the Ctime:L macro, with reference to the metonic cycle, and the VERY convoluted nested if-statements of Ctime:x. And I think there was a table of numbers in there somewhere also. It looks like 2024-5 is fixed, I had recorded similar errors for 2005-6 also, and they are fixed also. It looks like you fixed the computation in Ctime:L. (And simplified the presentation of Ctime:x). Thanks muchly! -- M.boli (talk) 00:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In fact, the bug in Ctime:00 was related to the problem with dates in the 10th and 11th year of a 19-year metonic cycle, as you described in Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_203. The missing pipe between "10=10" and "11=-1" caused a failure to compensate the gap. The bug in Ctime:L resulted in a problem with calculation of the leap year, which I found in calendar date of Dragon Boat Festival. There's no bug in Ctime:x actually. Please remind me if you find other problems later. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I think Ctime calculator works well and there's no need to replace it with a local file at present. As for some Chinese traditional festivals based on solar terms including Qingming Festival, Cold Food Festival and Dongzhi Festival, the difference is fixed between each of them and some of the equinoxes and solstices, whose dates could be found in Solstice-equinox. I've noticed that you mentioned in Calendar date/doc. I have created a localfile for Dongzhi Festival and leave the other two for discussion. -- NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Draft:Newgen Software Technologies Limited
Hello NmWTfs85lXusaybq. I am just letting you know that I deleted Draft:Newgen Software Technologies Limited, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 07:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

WP:U2
If you're going to move other people's userpages or nominate them for deletion, please have the courtesy of leaving them a note so they know where to find their work. Also, please review the criteria at WP:U2 – simple misspellings and pages left over from renames are not eligible for deletion. – bradv  05:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your remind. These redirects are not eligible for any criteria among WP:U2, WP:G6 and WP:R3. I have checked What links here and fixed internal links for them. Hope this could help. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

"Should be generally prohibited"
Can you please explain to me what your edit summary means "The use of Lenta.ru articles published since 12 March 2014 as references should be generally prohibited" is the website blacklisted or is it a personal preference? Also a side note I do not think these edits should be marked as Minor because they leave a statement unsourced. Paulpat99 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * It's blacklisted per WP:RSP. You can find the consensus in Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281 and Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 286. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah sweet thanks for that. Paulpat99 (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Page moves
Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq,

You have really been active these days doing article page moves. Some, like 110th Street (Manhattan), have been reverted. Please make sure you are following Wikipedia guidelines (Moving a page and Article titles) and are not just moving an article to a different name because it is your personal preference. Unless a page move is completely uncontroversial, you should start a discussion on the article talk page prior to moving an article to a different name. Most of all, slow down, doing dozens of page moves over a day can lead to a disaster if they are not being properly done. Start out with a few, see if they are challenged, and then you can move forward. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Liz,
 * Thanks for your reminder. I'm following the editing guideline Disambiguation to fix malplaced disambiguation pages. In most cases, I request a CSD G6 move if it's held up by a primary redirect and let an admin decide if it's uncontroversial. And I really appreciate your advice. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq,
 * If you are using both this account and EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL on any WikiMedia websites or tools, you need to post a notice on both talk pages identifying the secondary account as your alternate account. Otherwise, this could be seen as sockpuppetry even if you aren't operating both accounts simultaneously on the English Wikipedia. There is no downside of disclosure, many long-time editors have multiple accounts so please identify yours if you are using both accounts over the entire WikiMedia project. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, Liz,
 * That account was initially created on Chinese Wikipedia and has retired from there. Its registration here by SUL was caused by a misclick of interwiki link. However, I will post the notice on my talk page as you suggested. Thank you. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you, NmWTfs85lXusaybq. Many editors have alternate accounts, even ones they never use, the trouble only comes if they are unacknowledged. Thank you for posting a notice, that's all that is required.
 * I was just wondering why EqJjgOa8rVvsRmZL was running all of these Quarry queries and then you were tagging the pages for deletion. You either had to be the same editor or two editors who were working together. I see that you borrowed all of the queries you are using on Quarry. That's generally not a problem but it's nice to inform the original creator of the queries that you are using their work. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm not a sockpuppet
I just have this one account, and I edit in good faith. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn't say you are a sockpuppet of, while what you did to me might be a harassment. Besides, your username are confusing too. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not mean to harass you. If I did, my apologies. I just thought you needed a more understandable username. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Then why don't you select a so-called understandable username as you said? Don't you think "Mvcg66b3r" is confusing? And I don't know how you find me. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I found you through my watchlist; you posted a speedy deletion notification on Mlaffs' talk page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your clarification. I assume you are in good faith then. Sorry for my words. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No hard feelings. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Azad Kashmir Regiment
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Azad Kashmir Regiment, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azad_Kashmir_Regiment&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1159241318%7CAzad%20Kashmir%20Regiment%5D%5D Ask for help])

CS1 error on Ghandhara Nissan
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ghandhara Nissan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghandhara_Nissan&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1159740370%7CGhandhara%20Nissan%5D%5D Ask for help])

CS1 error on Ghandhara Nissan
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ghandhara Nissan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghandhara_Nissan&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1159740370%7CGhandhara%20Nissan%5D%5D Ask for help])

Mike Hoban
https://concussionfoundation.org/personal-stories/legacy-stories

You keep removing the same guy which is unsourced. I'm gladly say that he had died on May 30, 2023. Concussion Legacy Foundation had its own source. No obituary has made so stop removing that guy who is still alive. 160.3.13.209 (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * You still need to add that article node Michael Hoban as reference even if the obituary isn't available. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Removing redirect in user talk namespace
Hello! I noticed you reverted this edit. Per WP:BLANK, you can do this. "Page blanking is acceptable in one's own userspace."

Please note that user namespace is not just limited to user pages but user talk too. Per Liz’ comment in her edit summary, talk pages can be blanked but not deleted. The rename log can be found in the history of my user talk page if that is your concern. I would appreciate if you would self-revert as I’ve already done so twice. FatalFit &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 19:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Also see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Personal talk page cleanup:
 * "User talk pages are almost never deleted, although a courtesy blanking may be requested."


 * Thanks, FatalFit &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 19:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * This is obviously not your personal talk page because you have renamed your account. As some ip told you, that page should just be left alone as a redirect. And I see no justice in its blanking. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It’s still me, and I don’t understand why I can’t courtesy blank it. It contains my full name and birthday, how is that not something that could even possibly cause harm to me? Thanks, FatalFit &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 00:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Liz’ also mentioned that I can blank it, and I have provided you a guideline explaining why. It was also deleted on simplewiki under U1. FatalFit &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 00:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * And Liz didn't say it's your talk page because it's a redirect created by user renaming. If that page really contains your personal information, you may ask for WP:RFO instead. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sonya Hussyn
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sonya Hussyn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sonya_Hussyn&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1161937801%7CSonya%20Hussyn%5D%5D Ask for help])

User talk pages
Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq,

If an editor changes their username and doesn't want a redirect from their previous account to their new account, please do not insist on placing one on the page. There is no requirement that these redirects from old accounts to new accounts be present. I've seen at least two situations where you ignored the wishes of the editor and replaced a redirect that they had removed and I think your actions might be well-intentioned but are misguided.

Please respect the editor, if they don't want there to be a visible association between accounts, that's okay. All of the relevant information is there in the talk page history should anyone want to understand if the two accounts are linked, there doesn't need to be a redirect present. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Liz,
 * My concern is if you have noticed the misleading claims made by, a former sockpuppet. They tried to blank the talkpage redirects with false claims, such as Wrong redirect - unrelated (Special:Diff/1161448537) or redirect fixed (Special:Diff/1159386702). In addition, they fabricated a non-extant deletion debate (Special:Diff/1146689216) instead of blanking the page themselves. Should it be considered as in good faith? NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2011 Bahraini uprising
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2011 Bahraini uprising, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2011_Bahraini_uprising&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1162475335%7C2011%20Bahraini%20uprising%5D%5D Ask for help])

Speedy deletion of Tajdar E Harm Syed Hassan


The page Tajdar E Harm Syed Hassan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 11:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Talk page at 2023 French riots history deleted
Could you please restore the significant talk page history that you accidentally deleted on 2023 French riots? If you need help, don't hesitate to ask at the Help Desk. I don't know how to help you, but someone there probably will. -- SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 01:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I moved it to Talk:2023 French riots (disambiguation). NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * OK, I hope you won't mind if I move it back to where it was written. This page has been moved three times now during the move discussion. It would be best if people were aware of the problems with the dab page. --  SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 01:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Those talk pages were swapped associated with the subject pages. Now, I have swapped them back. Sorry for the inconvenience. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks for following up! I assume that you're aware that that move technically disrupted a move discussion that was in progress?  Who knows, maybe the back door maneuvering since the move discussion was opened was all for the best, it's not impossible.  I'm checking with Eggroll to see if I've really understood.  It may be just a formality that became necessary... this is all quite confusing, apologies. :)  --  SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 02:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 2023 French riots takes up the base name per WP:NOPRIMARY because it has no primary topic in the current form. Is there any discussion to determine the primary topic as Nahel Merzouk protests? If so, please correct the form per WP:ONEOTHER and move it back to 2023 French riots (disambiguation), no matter if 2023 French riots is a primary redirect. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry! I apologise for my recent disruptive moves actually I wanted to see that changing my user pages name can change my username so, I request to remove my name from Administrator intervention against vandalism Mr Unknown233 (talk) 12:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't have to make such false statement of your purpose to me. I have learned that of farming extended confirmed from your edits on User:Mr Unknown233. Leave for other editors to decide if your editing behavior is disruptive. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * When will decision come ? Mr Unknown233 (talk) 13:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Reverts
Good Day.

I added some highlights to the subject of USS Houston (SSN 713) regarding the novel, and her participation in the film "Hunt for Red October". I also mentioned that her hull number (documented in the Wikipedia article as SSN 713) and the City Of Houston's central area code 713 (common knowledge, not a "factoid").

Apparently you considered it a legitimate reason to declare my sources "Not reliable sources". That seems sort of arbitrary to me. Which of either of us can assert they are "unreliable" without specifying the reason, nor pointing out each assertion? Besides they came directly from Wikipedia. Did you also revert that article?

Your revert URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Houston_(SSN-713)&oldid=prev&diff=1164604410 Bd64kcmo (talk) 16:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Apparently, you should have read WP:RSPRIMARY to learn that Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Now, how in the hell are Wikipedians supposed to know about these obscure edicts? And how long have they been around? Well I did read it and it did say "Wikipedia articles *SHOULD* be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates to or discusses information originally presented elsewhere." (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE). So there's another set of Claymores to dig up before I do a small addition to an article. It seems to me Wikipedia has plenty of fact checkers to maximize the reliability of articles herein. Otherwise, I would consider a Wikipedian rule saying Wikipedia is not a reliable source as a self-indictment by Wikipedia ("don't trust me, although I'm Wikipedia,  I'm probably lying or wrong"). I believe it damages Wikipedia to cut itself, and renders citations of Wikipedia sources OUTSIDE Wikipedia as "unreliable", by Wikipedia's own rules. The only other solution I would see is direct citing of references in such an article (if they can be found) by digging, through the Library of Congress if it take that, or something short of an archeological dig. But that would be a roundabout way of getting the same result, with links to the original references. Yet if we watch the movie credits roll you'll see Houston's involvement. Last time I referred to a movie, maybe 8 or 9 years ago, I got a shellacking from some expert saying IMDB is not "reliable" enough, but did not refer me to "WP:RSPRIMARY". Perhaps it didn't exist yet. Honestly, I don't see a standard of reliability here, just an obscure set of obfuscated rules that have a questionable reason to be there.
 * So what should we do? get the movie out and note the time stamp for the credits showing USS Houston? Get the book out and cite the page number showing Dallas and her Skipper Bart Mancuso? Dig up an old city directory with a map of area codes showing the commonly known fact "713" is the area code for the city of Houston? Sharing a few facts has become a chore and evidently has left a trail of frustrated contributors here who got their articles reverted.
 * I can't make any sense or good purpose of any of these rules. Just a discombobulated mess. Bd64kcmo (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Paul Nooncree Hasluck
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paul Nooncree Hasluck, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20NmWTfs85lXusaybq&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1170416014 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Nooncree_Hasluck&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1170416014%7CPaul%20Nooncree%20Hasluck%5D%5D Ask for help])

CS1 error on Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20NmWTfs85lXusaybq&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1170489202 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dilan_Ye%C5%9Filg%C3%B6z-Zegerius&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1170489202%7CDilan%20Yeşilgöz-Zegerius%5D%5D Ask for help])

Revert
Hello, Why have you reverted my changes to "Edinburgh Handedness Inventory" on 14th August? Yours, Exodriv Exodriv (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Because you provided material without sourcing and modification linked to non-extant templates and categories. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It is wrong to source the Google Scholar citation count which increases every day. Anyone can look it up. I could give a precise number today if you think that is better than the form of words I chose.
 * The category "Anatomy" did need modification: hand preference say for writing is behavior and little or nothing to do with the anatomy of the hand. I accept that "Physiology" was just the plausible guess that turns out to be mistaken. Exodriv (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Then I see no justification in adding such material per WP:RS. As to templates and categories, you may ask for a renaming if you do have a good reason. However, the modifications in the articles are not constructive. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

A City of Ballarat article fork?
Hi NmWTfs85lXusaybq,

I'm not an Australian, so I may be mistaken in this, but it looks to me like we have two articles for the same "City of Ballarat" which should probably be merged, unless there might be some Australian logic of the two articles of which I am unaware. The two articles I see for the City of Ballarat (Australia) are, City of Ballarat and simply Ballarat.

I can't see why we need these two articles to be separate, and what exactly distinguishes the content of one article from the other. It seems to me that either the two articles should incorporate a definition of how they legitimately cover two distinct and different subjects in both their article titles, and in their lead paragraphs, or else they should be merged into the City of Ballarat article. What do you think about my observations on this possible "article fork"?

Thanks,

Lighthumormonger (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Lighthumormonger,
 * I find no justification to merge these articles: Ballarat is a city (categorized in Cities in Victoria) and the council seat of the local government area City of Ballarat (categorized in Local government areas of Victoria). You may find more article pairs in such form from Local government areas of Victoria, such as City of Frankston and Frankston, City of Melton and Melton.
 * Thanks,
 * NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Wildstyle
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I urge you to discuss your objections to this merge at Talk:Graffiti. 162 etc. (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I have no objection to this merge. However, I revert your edits because you just converted Wildstyle to a MISPLACED redirect without any mention of Wildstyle in Graffiti. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm struggling to find anything at Wildstyle that is supported by references to reliable secondary sources. Can you give me an example of what you think I should be adding to Graffiti? 162 etc. (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * To merge articles, you may follow the guideline on WP:PROMERGE step by step. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the article is sourced; therefore, it must all be deleted. See WP:PROVEIT. 162 etc. (talk) 07:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note that WP:PROMERGE asks us not to "just redirect the source page without copying any content if any good content from the source page exists." (emphasis mine.) 162 etc. (talk) 07:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case, you're suggested to obtain such a consensus from a deletion discussion per WP:ATD-R instead. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * AfD has been opened. 162 etc. (talk) 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Three localities in Bastak County, Iran, that are improperly entangled; advice kindly requested
I've been a frequent editor in pages related to administrative changes in Iran, but I've come across three pages I can't easily fix technically now that several things have been done before I had the chance to work on them. Perhaps you can help, or be in a position to pass this to someone who can assist in removing a stumbling block for which I lack the tools.

The event:

After the 2016 National Census, the village of Kukherd merged with the village of Harang and was renamed the city of Kukherdharang.

The correct solution would've been:

1) The Kukherd page would move to Kukherdharang (because renamed); the page would be edited to indicate the city's status as "formerly the village of Kukherd..." etc.; referenced with the proper government document; and edited to conform with its status as a city throughout the entire page.

2) The Harang page would not move; its status would now be as a "former village", and so the page would be edited and referenced to indicate its absorption during the merger.

The issue:

Unfortunately, none of that happened. Those three pages (Harang, Kukherd, and Kukherdharang) are entangled in a way I cannot easily undo.

1) Harang was moved to Kukherdharang, leaving behind a redirect from move. They aren't the same entity; the page shouldn't have been moved or redirected.

2) Kukherd was redirected to Kukherdharang, leaving behind a simple redirect. It should instead have been moved, because the entity itself was renamed.

As it stands now, both Harang and Kukherd redirect to Kukherdharang. After thinking about how this might be undone to result in a page for Harang (with all its history intact) and a page for Kukherdharang (with its history intact from the Kukherd page), I decided that I don't have the rights to be as bold as I might like and possibly break something.

The way to resolve this is:

1) Move Kukherdharang to Harang over the redirect (I'm unable to do that) 2) Edit the Harang page (Can do) 3) The redirect from move can be deleted, since the overall effect is simply to have restored the Harang page (I'm unable to do that) 4) Kukherd should not redirect to Kukherdharang but should be the original Kukherd page that can now moved to Kukherdharang where it belongs

I'm sorry to be long-winded about this issue that may seem trivial, but any advice or help you have would be appreciated. I can do the editing and have everything I need to get these articles back in shape after so much apparent vandalism and unnecessary ref bombing, etc., but they aren't in the right places. I basically need a Harang page and a Kukherd page with their intact histories and talk pages, and I can do the moving and editing from there.

Thanks for your time! Brightkingdom (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have completed the requested moves as you suggested. You may help to remove spams and update articles. Thanks. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Reverts
Hello. Could you please explain to me why did you revert me on several occassions? I don't know what's the point of this. There are other places called Storozheve so it shouldn't redirect to one of them, logically. I also don't know what the point of this is. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 07:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * These terms have no ambiguity on English Wikipedia because articles associated with interlanguage links are not extant here. Please refer to WP:DABNOT as well. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 09:43, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There's more than one notable individual known as Ștefan Holban. Some readers might look for one and some might look for another. The disambiguation page was useful for that purpose and your edits now restrict the entity "Ștefan Holban" to one single individual. Prior to my edits there had been confussion regarding both individuals showing disambiguation and clear separation is necessary. See for example this ("Ștefan Holban" used to be title for the general's article).
 * I also don't see anything in WP:PRIMARYRED nor in WP:DABNOT related to this. I do see that MOS:DABRED says red links can be included as long as they're linked in other non-disambiguation pages. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 11:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The point is you didn't include any linked articles except interlanguage links. For the format of such entities, you may refer to this citation, although there's still no consensus if they are acceptable. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 11:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not sure I've understood you. "Ștefan Holban" had two entities, one had a page in English Wikipedia and the other was an interlanguage link. Per that note you've linked it'd appear there is no consensus for removing entities with interlanguage links. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You still missed the point. It means there should always be a linked article which contains the red link no matter if you put an interlanguage link after it. For example:
 * (correct) Árbol, Villalba, a parish in Vilalba, Spain ✅
 * (incorrect) Árbol, Villalba, a parish in Spain
 * NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I restored both and added some blue links. Are they appropriate now? Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not really. The linked articles you added don't contains the red link in the entity. And please note that exactly one navigable article should be linked per MOS:DABONE. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry but you're not getting your point across effectively. With each time you name a new policy and convention you hadn't mentioned before. I am not experienced in this field of Wikipedia.
 * I added a link for Holban on the linked article and removed the link to Storozheve in the disamiguation page. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 20:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It's OK now. You're free to recreate Novofedorivka (disambiguation) deleted as a G14 candidate before. But please make sure its format correct. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I've also restored a disambiguation page for Novodarivka (Novodarivka (disambiguation)). You might have been right in reverting my move of the town with an existing article as it is substantially more populated than the others from what I've seen. It probably is the primary topic.
 * Glad we sorted this out. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, I have adjusted its format for the primary topic and added a linked article. It's now a WP:ONEOTHER article. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Fixed, for both. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Eswiki block
Hi. Is your eswiki block still affecting your membership of The Wikipedia Library? If so, let me tell you that I disagree with the sysop's resolution, and I think I can try to convince another sysop to unblock you, based on our common sense and ignore all rules policies, as your block is completely unnecessary and it doesn't help to reduce disruption, which is the purpose of the blocking feature, given that you declared that you wouldn't be active in eswiki.--SRuizR  23:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi
 * My memberships on some global wikimedia projects are still affected by this active block on eswiki. I was accidentally registered account and was reported for my username on trwiki as well. A nice sysop there rejected this report based on my statement (see here). I'm glad that you're willing to help me convince sysops on eswiki.
 * Thanks,
 * NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. Can you give me some examples of those global projects? I think that specifying some could be important to convince the sysops. Kind regards.--SRuizR Flag of Costa Rica.svg 00:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, Besides The Wikipedia Library, IRC hostmask cloak also has the following criteria: User must not be actively blocked from a project. Kind regards. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


 * LuchoCR has unblocked you. I hope everything goes back to normal. Kind regards.--SRuizR Flag of Costa Rica.svg 02:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Everything is fine now. Thanks for all your help and best regards. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sonya Hussyn
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sonya Hussyn, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sonya_Hussyn&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1162092367%7CSonya%20Hussyn%5D%5D Ask for help])

Swap between Talk:Solitaire (disambiguation) and Talk:Solitaire
Hi, Jc37,

The common swap of these talk pages was made for consistency with that of their subject pages I have done per RfC consensus. And DisambigProject should appear on the talk page of the disambiguation page itself (i.e. current Solitaire) rather than its redirect. However, you manually swapped them back without any explanation. I'm not sure how you found it and if there's any misunderstanding here. I'm asking for a formal guide on how to deal with such situation.

Thanks, NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * No worries. What you did was fine.
 * What I was following up on was that one of the talk page's content referring mostly to the dab page (which was now a redirect). And also wanted to make sure that the talk page with the majority of the discussion content wasn't "hidden" at the redirect. So if you look now at each talk page and each facing page, their content now basically matches.
 * This sometimes happens with talk pages when multiple moves happen. Fortunately this one wasn't too complicated.
 * Thank you for the note, and I hope you're having a great day : ) - jc37 03:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * And thank you for pointing out about the template. I've gone ahead and moved that as well. - jc37 03:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

G6 error nominations
Hello. I have declined a few of your G6 nominations because they were not clearly errors. I would suggest that you use redirects for discussion to seek deletion, if you so wish. Some of those redirects, like 2012‌-13 United States network television schedule and 2012‌–13 United States network television schedule, are long-standing redirects that have existed for years. Some were intentionally created (​​Karelia) and some were created by a page move. All have some chance of surviving RfD through WP:RfD and WP:RfD. As an individual administrator, I should not be short-circuiting such discussion. I would also note that you have been doing moves using your page mover tools for the same purpose. Given that I'm not certain they meet the criteria for redirect suppression, I would advise to wait for some sort of consensus to appear. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if you actually realized what I did before you declined my G6 nominations. I'm cleaning up erroneous redirects with implausible zero-width characters in their title. For example, you can compare 2012‌-13 United States network television schedule with 2012-13 United States network television schedule to find "%E2%80%8C" in its url-encoded title. I actually have discussed this task with an administrator Espresso Addict before. After my explaination on their talk page, they deleted Hyperbolic ‍secant under G6. Another administrator Extraordinary Writ have deleted Other‍ (philosophy) and Polar ‍bear even before that. If you checked pageviews and incoming links of the nominated redirects, you should have known their unhelpfulness. I hope you can reconsider their deletion. Thanks, NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm certainly no an expert on redirects, so if I've made a mistake in deleting Hyperbolic ‍secant out of process I'm (of course) perfectly willing to undelete it. It just doesn't seem to me that redirects using an invisible character (cf Hyperbolic secant) are conceivably useful? Am I missing something? Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm ambivalent about whether they should be deleted, but I don't believe that they should be speedily deleted. If redirects are implausible, R3 should be used instead of G6. If R3 cannot be used because they were not recently created, then perhaps there is a reason for that. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologies. I've restored it. If there are lots of these, then agree with that a bundled deletion discussion is the way to go. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * NmWTfs85lXusaybq, I did actually realise what you did before I declined your G6 nominations. I had to read your conversation with Espresso Addict because the redirects being tagged with just db-error and no other explanation did not make it very clear why they had been tagged. A few items that I think that it is important to note: The two redirects deleted by Extraordinary Writ were deleted as G7 because Uanfala, when creating them, described them as "temporary" and asked for their deletion after some time. NmWTfs85lXusaybq, you tagged them as G2 and they were deleted as G7s – validly so – while for the redirects that I declined, they were tagged as uncontroversial deletions. With respect to the speedy deletion policy, I don't view them as comparable.One of the RfD links that I gave explicitly says that "redirects with no incoming links are candidates for deletion because they are of benefit to the browsing user" (emphasis in original). As for page views, XTools doesn't really seem to work for them, so I'm not sure which tool you are using. When we are talking about implausibility and redirects, we should look at R3, which is specifically about implausible typos. The community has decided that R3 should only be used to delete redirects that were recently created – using G6 to circumvent that restriction, and to circumvent the community having a say, seems wrong. While it is admirable that you have discussed this with Espresso Addict, ultimately consensus should not stem from two people. Given the similar nature of the redirects you want to be deleted, I would suggest a mass/bundled nomination at RfD instead of nominating them one by one. Best wishes, Sdrqaz (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your clarification. These G6 candidates were tagged without any further explanation because I thought it was clear per db-error's description. Other‍ (philosophy) and Polar ‍bear weren't tagged as G7 because Uanfala didn't blank them or tag them himself, while he did describe their creation as test. And I didn't start a RfD nomination this time because an admin and the creator had short-circuited one of my RfD nomination, which was started by following due process adviced by another admin, per G6.
 * No incoming links does give them no chance of surviving RfD through WP:RfD rather than WP:RfD, while pageviews from XTools doesn't exclude the chance concerning WP:RfD either. Given that, I fully agree with Espresso Addict to undelete Hyperbolic ‍secant for its controversy and I will start a bundled RfD nomination instead. Best regards, NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Kukherdharang
The city of Kukherdharang with the merger of the village of Kukherd and the village of Harang according to the official approval of the government on 25 February 1391 in Bastak County of Hormozgan province.

Harang Wikipedia page should be merged with Kukherdharang It is explained in the background section with an authoritative source Arman.Farsi57 (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * This has been discussed here before with . Harang was intentionally kept and updated with the mention of status as a "former village" to indicate its absorption during the merger, while Kukherd was moved to Kukherdharang with a redirect left. No more manual modification is needed in these pages. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, NmWTfs85lXusaybq. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 13:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)