User talk:Renamed user hu45b523gg

Leaving results
Hi. Please consider reading WP:NOTNEWS, WP:LASTING, WP:RECENTISM, and (in particular) WP:10YEARTEST. Dozens of pupils in dozens of schools get high marks in the Leaving Cert. Every year. Even if the name and details of every such pupil were of lasting encyclopedic consequence (they are not), it is selective/arbitrary to dedicate content to one such pupil in a school article. (In CBC Cork alone, for example, numerous Leaving Cert candidates have scored "all As". Including in 2019, 2018, 2014, 2009, and multiple years before then.) It may be worth fleeting news coverage. On that day. But it isn't worth lasting coverage. In an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a newspaper or a re-publisher of short-lived news content. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please note that Wikipedia policy requires articles to be written from a neutral point of view. Be careful to avoid any editing which may look as though it promotes or espouses a point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mayo Association Dublin


A tag has been placed on Mayo Association Dublin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mayoassociationdublin.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  16:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Warning re edit warring
Your recent editing history at David Norris (politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Mayo Association Dublin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayo Association Dublin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mayo Association Dublin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 23:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)