User talk:Renamed user nS(P8hc(SDHC(D*ho3-09aUSDJK Jcndskb

nukes
Mojo-chan - very belatedly saw your posting from last Novemeber about UK control of nuclear weapons. I produced the Newsnight item you referred to. Essentially nuclear weapons states at the end of the Cold War looked at how they could reduce the risk of accidental nuclear war. Jeanne Kirkpatrick - Reagan's UN Ambassador chaired Fail Safe and Risk Reduction Commission in the US. One recommendation was preventing rogue commanders convincing their crews to launch a nuclear war. As a result Trident Coded Control Device was put on each Trident sub which could only allow launch after permissive codeword sent from Chiefs of Staff. Nuclear Posture Review confirmed this and there are eyewitness accounts from US Tridents confirming the existence of TCCD system in place from 1997. I have it on good authority - though not Wikiable - that Russia and France also have similar PAL systems on their subs. We assumed that UK had done the same but MoD - and indeed a Trident commander confirmed to us that as a matter of principle UK does not do this - individual Commander can launch without a code - although of course they insist that Commanders are well-trained and could not possibly convince enough of the crew to go along with them. Be that as it may the Americans (and French and Russians) decided it wasn't a risk worth taking. Newsnightmeirion (talk) 10:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional info there, it is much appreciated. I am a bit busy now but will try to review the article at some point and incorporate it. Good to know Newsnight people take an active interest in Wikipedia! Mojo-chan (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry so late in saying welcome!
I am really glad that you added the Article rescue squadron template to your user page. I don't know if anyone ever said welcome to the squadron, if not, WELCOME!

Please take a minute to sign your name to our list of 270+ members:
 * ARSM

Good news, we are building our first newsletter and should sent out this weekend, keep an eye out for it!

And a warm welcome to the squadron!

{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

More 'vandalised' articles
Hello Mojo-chan. I saw that you had problems with the editor 'Boundarylayer'. There are some other, nuclear-power-related articles, that were similarly 'improved' by this editor: Nuclear power phase-out and Anti-nuclear movement. Maybe you could have a look at these articles? I tried to repair what I could. Anyway, a happy new year to you!

87.189.109.124 (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Case Closed". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  operator /  talk  21:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

I Stand On Your Side
Hello, ゼーロ

I am one of the victims managed to be blocked by Jeh and his/her crowds, and obviously, Jeh's evil crawls have already surrounded you. But do please trust yourself, trust your belief. Do not even waste any penny for his or their dirty behaviour. Jeh's has already lost his/her reputation, if he had ever before, I have no ideas. I would support you mentally to get rid of Jeh's traps.

Best Regards, A.J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.106.246 (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

DRN discussion started
I was able to get it started finally. Sorry for the delay: Dispute_resolution_noticeboard. --Ronz (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent changes to the proposed RfC
This late in the process, I'm surprised by much of your recent changes.

Proposing something with tagged, disputed content basically has no chance of being accepted, and really shouldn't be proposed in an RfC. 

Similarly, proposing content that doesn't have enough context to be included shouldn't be proposed either.

Do you mind if I just leave these out? --Ronz (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I was just trying to include the original version that Tsavage wrote, but I don't mind if you want to leave that one out. I'd prefer if you left my proposed "industry reaction" bit in though, as I feel that the Microchip video alone should be included. Do what you feel is best. ゼーロ (talk) 10:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That works. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

IPBE
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! ゼーロ (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Head swap for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Head swap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Head swap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)