User talk:ReneeNal

Welcome!

Hello, ReneeNal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Trevor Loudon does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- haminoon  ( talk ) 03:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2015
Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Trevor Loudon without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 03:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Trevor Loudon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 05:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Trevor Loudon has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 05:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Barack Obama and the Enemies Within for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barack Obama and the Enemies Within is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barack Obama and the Enemies Within until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 07:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 07:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Trevor Loudon, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Trevor Loudon. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Trevor Loudon, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- haminoon  ( talk ) 08:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Haminoon. Your recent edit to the page Trevor Loudon appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 04:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, ReneeNal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Trevor Loudon, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. It appears from your user name that you have a conflict of interest with respect to this subject. jps (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)