User talk:Renee in mich

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Tidball (June 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Tidball and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jeff_Tidball Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jeff_Tidball reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jeff Tidball


Hello, Renee in mich. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jeff Tidball".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jeff Tidball concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jeff Tidball, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jeff Tidball


Hello, Renee in mich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff Tidball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * @Praxidicae Hello and thank you! I see that we have been going back and forth with the Speedy Deletion/Undo Speedy Deletion. I can definitely stop removing it – I am trying to bring this article into alignment with Encyclopedic criterion and am happy to continue to do so, which is why I was Undoing the Speedy Deletion. Can we find a way to not Speedy Delete this article and instead allow me to work towards a value-neutral version that will meet Wikipedia's criteria? And any specific feedback you may have about how that article is promotional would be appreciate – I have attempted to edit out everything the original author included that seemed promotional or not value-neutral. Renee in mich (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Renee in mich
 * One way to avoid deletion would be not to bring this into the main article space before it's ready. (There exists a pending draft, and I'm assuming this is a copypaste move thereof?) I was going to take this to AfD, but I can move it to drafts instead, if you prefer. As it stands, the sources cited are not enough to establish the subject's notability. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC)