User talk:Reneeidk/sandbox

Article Review
The lead section is good, its quite straightforward. I feel like it has the relevant information noted, but other then the early life section the other sections seem to be a bit short. Although I like how the article sections start chronologically with her early life and then her career as an artist, I feel like this shows clear structure. After reading I can see that even though there doesn't seem to be much information its all relevant. The coverage of this article seems very heavy on her early life, when looking at the other sections it seems unbalanced. This article is written in a very neutral way overall, not presenting any sides but just the information. All of the information has sources, the sources are solid as a far as I can tell. Kkmainiac (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC) PS. If you don't mind reviewing the edits for my article that would be much appreciated.