User talk:Renegade0894

Re
A statement that dubious is going to require a source. Marcus  Qwertyus   02:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have no choice but to assume bad faith if you can't provide a source. Marcus   Qwertyus   06:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Renegade0894 (talk) 23:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Sorry, that was not my intention. It will not happen again. I was new to Wikipedia and unfamiliar with the requirements for posting when I submitted that information. It wasn't in bad faith, I was just contributing what I was told in school about the etymology behind the phrase.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Serafart. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to LZ 129 Hindenburg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 02:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LZ 129 Hindenburg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LZ 129 Hindenburg, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LZ 129 Hindenburg. ''The hindenberg is just a German airship, not a "nazi" airship. Especially as it began construction before the Nazi seizure of power. If it was built by the Nazi party, then sure, it's a nazi airship, but it was not.'' Serafart (talk) (contributions) 18:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

With all due respect, I was not vandalizing wikipedia and I would not have continued to edit and cite sources if I was not acting in good faith and confident that I was correct. I will not edit the article again, but I would ask you to reconsider your position given the extent of Nazi involvement with the airship. It pretty much was built by the Nazi party. They paid for its completion, put their flag on it, and were the only ones to ever fly it. The Nazis even changed its original design to use hydrogen instead of helium. How much more involvement by the nazis is needed for it to be considered a nazi airship?

"Actual construction of LZ-129 began in the Fall of 1931, but progress lagged due to a severe lack of funds during the Depression. At first, the Nazi Party’s assumption of power in January, 1933 had little effect on the fortunes of the Zeppelin Company, partly due to Air Minister Hermann Göring’s dislike of lighter-than-air flight. But Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels was aware of the potential symbolic value of LZ-129 as a showcase for German strength and technology, and in 1934 Goebbels offered Hugo Eckener 2 million marks toward the completion of LZ-129."

https://www.airships.net/hindenburg/lz129-hindenburg-detailed-history/