User talk:Renevarro

Welcome!
Hello, Renevarro, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page PrognoCIS, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of PrognoCIS
Hello Renevarro,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged PrognoCIS for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:41

What can I do to make it seem non-promotional?

'''Hello,

I updated my text based up on your feedback. Is there anything else that I need to change?

Best, Rene'''


 * Hi! I am answering to your questions made here and here. You say that you "already submitted your draft twice without luck". What draft? If you talk about "User:Renevarro/sandbox", than I have to tell you that you never submitted it for review. Draft articles are not submitted automatically, but you have to add this code: to the top of the article. I also have to tell you that your article, in its present form, will certainly not be accepted. It does not cite any sources to prove the company's notability (see: WP:COMPANY). Every Wikipedia article has to cite several reliable independent source, so to prove the notability of the subject (please, see: WP:42 ), but your article does not cite any source. If you do not know how to cite sources, see: WP:CITING. In other words, you'll have to find some books, newspapers articles, internet news portals or so that discuss the company in depth, and to add citations to those sources to the article. But, remember: those have to be reliable, independent sources that significantly cover the subject. Not official web site of the company (that is not independent), not some minor web site (not reliable), not some list that only mentions the company (has to be significant coverage). That is the only way to prove that the company is notable (if it is), and to make the article accepted. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

User page moved
I moved your main user page, User:Renevarro, to User:Renevarro/sandbox2.

Your main user page should not be used for drafts. See WP:User pages for details. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  21:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)