User talk:Renfrewash

Please stop participating in all the nonsense about Hitler, the Renfrew Jews and the Renfrew museum. This is the only warning you will receive. If you continue abusing your editing privileges, you will be blocked from editing. Pascal.Tesson 05:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

In my defense...
There is some truth to this urban myth about Hitler in Renfrew. However at this time I cannot find any concrete evidence. It is my belief that there is some cover up going on. I think Hitler was a horrible person and caused much grief.

However I was just trying to shed some light on this issue and not trying to glamorize Hitler. You need not threaten me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Renfrewash (talk • contribs).
 * Sorry if I'm unphased but that was utter nonsense and I'd appreciate it if you stuck to verifiable facts from now on. Thanks. On a sidenote, I have deleted the category Category:List of Trailer Park Boys episodes since this is precisely why we have List of Trailer Park Boys episodes. Pascal.Tesson 18:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Renfrewash, the lack of any 'concrete evidence' for 'some truth' in the story and for your 'belief in a cover up' is because the the material was all a hoax and deliberate vandalism in the first place. You appeared to be part of it, and I thought Pascal.Tesson was admirably restrained. Rexparry sydney 03:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Well Sasquatch has wiki entry so I don't see why zombie hitler cannot have one? Even if it isn't real doesn't mean that it cannot be considered part of urban folklore. Renfrewash 19:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If you don't see the difference between zombie Hitler in Renfrew and a well-known legend like Sasquatch which has been the subject of hundreds of books and thousands of articles, then I'm afraid you don't quite understand what Wikipedia is. In any case, make sure you don't reintroduce that sort of junk. Pascal.Tesson 19:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Trailer Park episodes
Please read Television episodes. I will merge the page again: Wikipedia is not tv.com and it's not becoming tv.com any time soon. The whole article is a plot summary and this is not the purpose of Wikipedia. You also fail to provide any evidence that the episode itself has been the subject of sufficient third-party critical commentary to live on its own. Pascal.Tesson 20:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

How can any third party provide any critical commentary when you remove the page when it's less than a day old? It's not even given a chance! I followed the guideline for Television episodes provided by wiki and my episode description met the criteria. I guess it doesn't live up to the unattainable standards of Pascal Tesson! According to your logic there should be no episode dedicated pages yet wiki is littered with them i.e LOST, Scrubs, The Prisoner. "It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power." Renfrewash 17:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)