User talk:Reopening of White Star Line

Speedy deletion nomination of RMS Titanic 3 (2032)


A tag has been placed on RMS Titanic 3 (2032) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  16:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Please do not add fiction to Wikipedia. This includes turning your userpage into a fictional history of the White Star Line.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reopening of White Star Line


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Reopening of White Star Line, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 11:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Reopening of White Star Line


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Reopening of White Star Line, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 14:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (why i wrote this article you always delete it you know i spent a lot of time writing this ) --Reopening of White Star Line (talk) 16:14, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Warning
If you go on adding this fictional material to Wikipedia, you are likely to be blocked from editing. There are plenty of free webhosts where you can post whatever you like. This is not one of them. This is an encylopaedia, not Facebook. Peridon (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Peridon, you may be blocked from editing. BusterD (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at User:Peridon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BusterD (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)