User talk:Reordcraeft

Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Message
Please answer on the talk page of "2021 Tbilisi Pride Protests" article. ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 08:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@Reordcraeft: ჩემ ვერსიას რომ შლი და შენ დეზინფორმაციას რომ აბრუნებ, აქ გამეცი პასუხი გვერდზე ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 08:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Compassionate727. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to We Happy Few (Supernatural) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Shame Movement moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shame Movement, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have moved this article to the draft space, because it needs more references to support the contents, and more sources to establish notability. Once you have added these, you're welcome to submit it for pre-publication review via the AfC process. Thank you, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Update on Tbilisi Pride attack page
The user with which you've had considerable difficulty with on the 2021 attack on Tbilisi Pride page,, has since been permanently banned for similar behaviors on other pages and abusively using multiple accounts. I'll be watching the page in case a sock of theirs pops up again, but you should be able to edit the page again without having all your work undone by an aggressive POV pusher. I see they even attempted to shame and argue with you on this talk page. What a gentleman. Mewnst (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey! Thank you very much for the update, it's much appreciated. I won't hide that I'm glad that this is how it ended. I will be editing the article again in the future, to restore unduly removed factual information, make it less biased and remove things that masquarade as alternative points of view, while being pure disinformation. I see that other editors have done their best to control the abusive behavior of the now banned user, for which I'm very thankful. That's why I will take time to analyze the changes that have taken place since I last edited it. Reordcraeft (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shame Movement (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shame Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:QueerEcofeminist&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 14:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shame Movement (August 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shame Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 09:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shame Movement (November 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shame Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EchidnaLives&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shame_Movement reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  22:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shame Movement


Hello, Reordcraeft. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shame Movement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  01:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)