User talk:Replicant99

June 2018
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jurassic Park (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Seriously bro
There are tons of articles that disclose that. Critics and audiences around the world know that. I don’t even know what you’re trying to prove here. Replicant99 (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * If there are tons of articles, cite one or two of them. Every fan can assert the same thing about their favorite movies. They can't all be right. In fact, I agree it was a great movie. That does not overcome Wikipedia's guidelines.


 * The following quote from a Wikipedia guideline page is relevant here: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described in Verifiability."


 * (Where does it stand on any authoritative list of great movies and how far down the list do we go if it is a long list? If it is not on such a list, where is the support except many people liked it?) Helpful information about verifiability and citations can be found at Verifiability, Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes.


 * I'll accept that you were frustrated and not trying to be uncivil or make a personal attack but you should be aware that strong language, especially in a hostile context, also can violate Civility.


 * Other helpful links about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents.


 * I have replied here and deleted your entry on my talk page. Donner60 (talk) 04:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

COME ON.
HEY. I wasn’t even being hostile. Don’t be sensitive. Excuse me for just “adding a few words” and not knowing how to citate very well. It’s my first time, and I think you’re going a bit overboard with regulations and certain rules. If I can’t put it on there, why don’t you? Replicant99 (talk) 04:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to King Kong (2005 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)