User talk:Reportingfakes

February 2015
Hello, I'm AgnosticPreachersKid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Chinnock because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. APK whisper in my ear  05:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Chinnock, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear  05:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

It isn't defamatory content. It is real reviews for a fake persona. If you find it defamatory, perhaps that means you have either not read the content, or are one of Chinnocks many fake accounts

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Joseph Chinnock, you may be blocked from editing. APK whisper in my ear  05:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

you are reported as well

blocking this page so vehemently showed a lot. Thank you Joseph

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Joseph Chinnock. APK whisper in my ear  05:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Go ahead.. you will as well

By the way if you have such an issue with me making legitimate edits, then why are you trying so desperately to revive a page removed for lack of validity? You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 06:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Continued soapboxing
I've removed an unblock request (from an IP, but obviously this user) that continues the same soapboxing. I've also revoked talk page access and semi-protected. -- Kinu  t/c 15:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. -- Kinu  t/c 15:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)