User talk:Reportsporusskie

NPOV
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia would be more correct in posting of Darwin's Theory as applied to the origin of man as Darwin's Hypothesis -- ( The bias toward accepting Darwin as a Theory without dissent should be removed in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines.)
 * For evidence one may refer to the definition of hypothesis. Darwin's "Theory" as stated does not meet that definition and Wikipedia should  state this in the write up about Darwin's Theory (Hypothesis).  http://www.google.com/search?&q=define:Hypothesis
 * Consensus may lead Wikipedia to continue to use Darwin's Theory, but Wikipedia Neutral point of view policy may indicate including Hypothesis
 * Darwin himself explains the value of presenting both sides.

"False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for everyone takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness; and when this is done, one path toward errors is closed and the road to truth is often at the same time opened." (Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man) http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Charles-Darwin-Theory-Evolution.htm
 * Occam's Razor may be germane in this explanation. http://physics.about.com/od/physics101thebasics/a/hypothesis.htm
 * There is not consensus on the fossil record has to  support Darwin's "Theory"  as he stated it so his hypothesis has not been proven. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080129133108AAZ0B7w   Instead the "Theory" has had to be updated.
 * Such mention would serve the Wikipedia readers well in presenting a neutral and unbiased information source.
 * Therefore "Hypothesis" should be included as an alternate. (Reportsporusskie (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC))


 * Perhaps you should learn what the word theory actually means in a scientific context. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)