User talk:RepublicanVet

Jill Carroll
Hello. This message is regarding the page Jill Carroll. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. - Jersyko &middot;talk 01:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I recommend discussing your changes to the article, which I hope you agree that some might consider controversial, on the article's talk page before incorporating them in the article. Also, I recommend taking a look at Wikipedia's neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research policies.  All contributions to Wikipedia must adhere to these and other relevant Wikipedia policies.  Thanks. -  Jersyko &middot;talk 02:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, the Jill Carroll kidnapping has not "been proven" to be a hoax, but it has only been argued to be a hoax. Additionally, please see WP:3RR, which is a Wikipedia policy which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -  Jersyko &middot;talk 02:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Vet
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Big E 1977 02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked for 48 hours for disruption by removing content from pages, removing AFD notices, making personal attacks, being incivil, and inserting comments in such a way that they appear to have been made by someone else. Please feel free to contribute again when the block expires, but please try to make useful contributions instead. Stifle (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)