User talk:Republicoficoris

Speedy deletion nomination of Republic of Icoris


A tag has been placed on Republic of Icoris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Alexf(talk) 17:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
You wrote, Also, if there is nothing I can do to prevent this article from being deleted, I hope that, at the very least, I will be able to restart the page when the Republic of Icoris will become significant.

Indeed you will, but it is best to wait for someone else to do it, someone you have never commissioned or even heard about. If that takes several years, then so be it. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia does not intend to ever become a primary source about anything. When we talk about significance, we mean whether or not the article's topic has been the subject of reliable third-party coverage from sources not affiliated in any way with the micronation.

In the mean time, you may want to chronicle your nation's growth on a page such as [Facebook]. That's where a major news source might find information about your micronation, and that news source will be what another person will use as a starting point for his Wikipedia article about your micronation. Whether or not such a process has occurred (past, not future) is what we use as a criterion to determine significance. Hope that helps clear up the matter. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)