User talk:Repulsiveplum

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Paradoxataur
Hello Repulsiveplum,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paradoxataur for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrBauer24 (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article
You couldn't delete it. As an administrator, I can and did. Here at Wikipedia, we try to help with school and college projects, and to be tolerant of mistakes. We do insist on people following the rules, however, as this is an encyclopaedia that is read worldwide. One of the rules is 'no hoaxes'. Not even for class work. If you want to try a proper subject (not easy - if they're not already written about, they're probably not notable enough), you may find that your class work will stand as a real article. Read WP:GNG and WP:RS. Without fitting both of these, deletion is inevitable. Peridon (talk) 22:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * BTW on my hoax rating scale (best = 10), I'd only give it 2. Far too obvious even if you hadn't put the disclaimer on. Peridon (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cryptozoology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crete, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 23:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I hope I wasn't wrong in not blocking you indefinitely. At the talk page of the deleted article you wrote " I'm learning how to create a page for a class so I figure creating something not real for fun. I will delete the content after the project is over" and you continued to add nonsense to other articles. I've only blocked you for 2 weeks hoping that if you edit again you will avoid nonsense edits. Dougweller (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)