User talk:Rerumcognitionis

Welcome!

Hello, Rerumcognitionis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ultimate Study Method, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultimate Study Method


A tag has been placed on Ultimate Study Method, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultimate Study Method


A tag has been placed on Ultimate Study Method, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk  07:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Rerumcognitionis (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * This page was amended from its previous deleted version to remove any items that may promote a single product. At present it simply provides information about the study system called "Ultimate Study Method"; it makes no statements about its efficacy and does not promote it in any way. The website link for the USM site was also removed. In fact there is also a criticism in the second paragraph stating that the method uses elements which are not original and actually exist in other study techniques Rerumcognitionis (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ultimate Study Method, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk  07:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I have tried to create this page before and it was deleted; I then asked for advice from the person who has flagged it for deletion and I believe I have modified it accordingly. It would be useful if you provided more information for flagging it for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rerumcognitionis (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article for the second time after another admin deleted it a few days ago.

Although it may not mention the name of the company specifically, there is a company by that name, & it nonetheless clearly is intended to promote it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and can not be used for that purpose.

Additionally, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. An article that does not do so will be deleted here in one or another of our methods. If you do have such references for the method, and the method describes more than this one company's offerings, give it a try. Without them, don't even attempt it. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.  DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.  DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)