User talk:Res.ipso.loquitor

January, 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. WLU (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WLU (talk) 20:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for placing the links in the text itself, you may want to consider using citation templates and in-line citation; it generates a standardized template that ensures the reader has full access to all the information they might want to know about the sources themselves. Here's some relevant links:


 * Citation templates
 * Reference generator, I don't use it much
 * pubmed/isbn template generator, incredibly useful, uses the pubmed number or isbn to automatically generate a citation template for you
 * Google scholar autocitation, a google-style search engine and reference generator. Useful when the article doesn't have a pubmed number (old, social sciences or humanities).
 * tools, but the above are my favourites to date

Also note that in general, quotations are not used heavily in the body text of wikipedia articles. WP:QUOTE has more information, as does WP:SS; in general, extensive quotations are seen as placing undue weight on the statement itself - since quotations are rare, they stand out when used. WLU (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dr. Henry Heimlich + Marla Gibbs.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dr. Henry Heimlich + Marla Gibbs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HenryHeimlich MarlaGibbs.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:HenryHeimlich MarlaGibbs.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)