User talk:Research17

Nomination of Tom Lonsdale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Lonsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Lonsdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Julia Leigh page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=733873724 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F733873724%7CJulia Leigh%5D%5D Ask for help])

Yes, apologies for this. Will see if I can rectify. Thanks for the heads-up. Research17 (talk) 02:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Lonsdale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Lonsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Lonsdale& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox ; talk 23:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Research17. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 04:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

re: "Brian Martin (Social Scientist)"
Hi. If people agreed that social scientists were not excluded, then that would mean this entry is not automatically excluded, and that much would be fine. I just found that there is indeed a WP article for him, which had not been linked by the person who included the new species name, so had missed it. His claim to fame seems somewhat dubious, but if people are okay with such figures, then go ahead and re-add the reference, with an appropriate link. Dyanega (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Question for you
Hi Research17. I just reviewed the history of this page, and realized that no one has asked you if you have any relationship with Brian Martin - the edit count tool shows that this article has been your main area of focus in Wikipedia.

If you have some real world relationship with him, that would constitute a COI in Wikipedia per the WP:COI guideline. Would you please disclose if you have some relationship with him? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ? Let me say it differently -- would you please clarify whether or not you have some RW relationship with him?  Jytdog (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Sure. I have looked at WP;COI and I can confirm that I have no personal, academic, professional, business or legal relationship with BM. I should say I am interested in some of the issues which BM raises, although I don't think this constitutes a COI, especially as the contested nature of this article is an indication that many others are also interested in these issues. Just for the record, I am not an anti-vaxxer, and I am little uneasy with BM's philosophy of science, although I probably need to think more on this. You're correct, I have spent some time on this article, and the reason is that I think this represents a particular challenge for Wikipedia, in terms of constructing a bio of someone who clearly has some vocal critics. This is why I am working hard to establish consensus. As I have indicated in the talk pages, I like to think that we are slowly making some progress here. Thanks for the query. Research17 (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Thanks for replying. Jytdog (talk) 00:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Just a brief extension of the above comments, to confirm that I also have no personal, professional, business or legal relationship with Judith Wilyman. BTW, I think that an edit count alone may be at times be misleading. Because the BM wikipedia page is so deeply controversial and so contested, I've found myself making multiple postings on the Talk Page, in an attempt if not to reach consensus, then at least to open up dialogue. I've been involved in creating or editing numerous other WP pages, which have been much more straightfoward. Not sure if this shows up on the edit-count. Research17 (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hal Porter Short Story Prize moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hal Porter Short Story Prize, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jake Lynch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BDS ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jake_Lynch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jake_Lynch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize


Hello, Research17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hal Porter Short Story Prize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Your edit to Frank Warrick has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. --- Possibly (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Respectfully disagree that there was a copyright violation, but, hey, I think the Frank Warrick article will probably be added to and expanded upon in any case in the next day or so, as this is in the news due to his recent death. Thanks for your own interest and contribution to the article. Research17 (talk) 10:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Council for Human Rights Education


A tag has been placed on Australian Council for Human Rights Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Stair locomotion moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Stair locomotion. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and '''this reads like the abstract to the only research it sources. There's nothing showing any sort of actual notability to this topic. Fails WP:N and WP:NOT; Wikipedia is not a textbook, scientific journal, or mirror of either'''. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WhoAteMyButter ( 🌴talk │ ☀️contribs ) 08:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Stair locomotion
Hello, Research17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stair locomotion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stair locomotion


Hello, Research17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stair locomotion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)