User talk:Researcher88

License tagging for Image:Joseph Lerner.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph Lerner.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! mattbr30 19:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image copyright problem with Image:Teng Li.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Teng Li.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. mattbr30 19:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Li Wang.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Li Wang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr30 19:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Teng Li article
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. FreplySpang 20:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The articles Li Wang, Teng Ling and Mark Skazinetsky have been deleted for the same reason. Please do not copy text from other websites into Wikipedia articles. FreplySpang 20:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issues at Joseph Lerner
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Joseph Lerner article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. 4meter4 (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2010 (UTC) ‎

Further copyright issues at Joseph Lerner and conflict of interest concerns
Hello Researcher88. As I clearly indicated to you above, wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text from other web sites for legal reasons. If you continue to copy paste content from other websites I will have to report you which may get you permanently blocked from editing the encyclopedia. If you feel that the content you want to add should be allowed there is a specific process we must follow for legal reasons which you can find at Donating copyrighted materials.

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Joseph Lerner, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.4meter4 (talk) 02:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Last warning
This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Copyright infringement is a very serious offence and can result in legal action.4meter4 (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Let me clarify the above, that by legal action I was refering to wikipedia itself being vulnerable to being sued and not threatening Researcher88. I appologize if he mistook my words.4meter4 (talk) 02:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Your recent edits to User:4meter4 could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 02:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 04:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan salek


The article Susan salek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Susan salek
I have nominated Susan salek, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Susan salek. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  ttonyb (talk) 20:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

A note
Please stop removing tags without addressing the issues they have raised, as well as hunting down the users who disagree with you. Wikipedia works by consensus and such behavior is considered disruptive. Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Materialscientist for noticing this issue. Please take a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nrswanson/Archive#Report_date_March_8_2010.2C_14:11_.28UTC.29. This user's user name is listed amongst Suspected sockpuppets in Wikipidai:Sockpuppet investigations/Nrswanson/Archive reported on March 8 2010, 14:11 (UTC). In addition, this user has deleted and wrongfully altered this specific article obsessively and intensely. This matter was discussed with Wikipidia administration office and copyright division and there is a ticket number issued for it. and Researcher88 (talk) 19:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

In the meantime, please do examine WP:BLP policy. Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 13:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked because of this threat . You will remain blocked until you explicitly retract it. If your one week block has not expired, you will still have to wait that out or appeal it. Dougweller (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)