User talk:ResearcherStudierIam

Welcome!
Hi ResearcherStudierIam! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Verifiability
All content at Wikipedia must be verifiable, generally by means of citations to reliable sources. Please do not add unsourced content to Wikipedia; all such content is subject to removal at any time. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * thanks ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to John Friedberg, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * i meant to make an edit its not real edit i dont know how to so sorry ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 13:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * that one isn't real edit but i thought isnt sandbox ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 13:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Given your subsequent edits at Jiang Lifu, I am disinclined to believe that "this was just an accident". And, if you are, indeed, continuing to make the same mistake, you will still be blocked because competence is required. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jiang Lifu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Logging out to make the same edit anonymously is considered a form of sock puppetry and will also get you blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * stop it ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * i'm deleting this account because of you happy now are you happy but I didnt even do anything im just editing facts for jiang lifu but i hope your happy you r making me delte my account and I had a barnstar because of my knowledge on wartime chengdu's dendroarcheaology and my knowledge on ichtyology in the Republic of china ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * hi sorry wikidan61 i got a little overboard by the way did you listen to interwar polish muisc by famous one is tata da raka by mira ziminska you should listen also ach jak pryzjiemnie by adam aston ResearcherStudierIam (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/ResearcherStudierIam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Spicy (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)