User talk:Researchingaccreditedfacts

Welcome!
Hello, Researchingaccreditedfacts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Girth Summit  (blether) 21:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Where are you guys getting your evidence for the existing claims on badly written wikipedia posts? You're selectively quoting from secondary sources, census reports, you clearly haven't read properly? Who has the ultimate authority to deny established historical facts about groups, nations, origin myths, identities on Wikipedia; - editors with no serious sustained intellectual investiture in the ideas they espouse? Is this why this site exists, for people to hoodwink readers into political non-facts masquerading as ethnic or historical facts? The posts on Azad Kashmir and Punjabi Kashmiris have a biased political hue, it's pretty obvious you're trying to separate people into false enclaves that didn't exist in history, ur citing non-facts, from authors, who are not saying what you are saying. You're misquoting actual books, if indeed u've read them, from cover to cover. Aisha Jalal, for instance and whom you've quoted, would never support the claims you're making in the posts about Punjabi Kashmiris, so the question I ask again, why are you deleting my posts? Because there are no citations? Okay... I will add the citations, and let us begin a genuine conversation on what constitutes knowledge and pseudo-knowledge.

October 2020
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in articles Mirpur, Pakistan, Kashmiris of Punjab, Kashmiri diaspora etc., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kashmiris of Punjab, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 09:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 11:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I have demonstrated here in the paragraph I wrote, which u've expunged again, citing ur own flawed wikipedia definition on ethnicity; please read actual books on ethnicity, that there is no credibility in the claims u r espousing on this post. Someone from Wikipedia should look into the dubious practises of censuring accredited voices on Kashmir; there seems to be a political agenda at play here. I have just cited sources proving that the claims in the following post are false. Who exactly is this Kautilya3 - who made him an authority on Kashmir, expunging whatever he wants, it's time u had these discussions with people with a backgrounds in the ideas u like to play with. This whole Wikipedia enterprise is flawed, there is not an arena for scholarship, but people spreading bad and false ideas to deceive naive and impressionable members of the public.